In traditional scientific experiments, validity, accuracy, and precision correspond to authenticity. However, in ecological experiment the situation is quite different and only by ensuring validity can we obtain authenticity. In light of this, we should strive to ensure that the "concept of measurement" is covered but not overlapped with the "concept of research" or "concept of imaginary" in the experimental process, and measuring real things in the process of establishing the validity of ecological experiments. Accuracy corresponds to authenticity, however, in ecological experiments, the "true" reference value is difficult to obtain. Even the acquisition may not be reliable, thus improving technical performance of the instrument, improving the operating flow of experiment, and adopting other methods such as "blank value" test are required. It is necessary to improve accuracy in an effort to obtain accurate results, or qualitatively determine whether or to what extent the experimental data in the ecological measurement are accurate, according to the relevant theoretical and empirical analysis. Precision is positively related to reliability. In ecological experiment, precision should be increased to guarantee reliability, otherwise, even if the true experimental result is obtained, it may not be believed due to poor precision (reliability). Generally, for different types of ecological experiments, from mathematical models to digital organisms to artificial life systems (cosmological experiments) and finally to the natural system that is not disturbed or processed, the complexity is increasing, the precision is decreasing and the authenticity is getting worse. Therefore, we must select the appropriate type of experiment and weigh the precision and authenticity of the experiment with case study.
XIAO Xianjing
. The pursuit of the authenticity of ecological experiments——Based on validity, accuracy, and precision considerations[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2018
, 36(18)
: 81
-88
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2018.18.009
[1] 大卫·福特. 生态学研究的科学方法[M]. 肖显静, 林祥磊, 译. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2012:52-56. David Ford. Scientific method for ecological research[M]. Xiao Xianjing, Lin Xianglei, trans. Beijing:China Environmental Sci-ence Press, 2012:52-56.
[2] 张常智, 张明海, 姜广顺. 中国野生东北虎数量监测方法有效性评估[J]. 生态学报, 2012(9):5943-5952. Zhang Changzhi, Zhang Minghai, Jiang Guangshun. Effective-ness evaluation of monitoring methods for Wild Amur tiger in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012(9):5943-5952.
[3] Leverenz J W, Hällgren J E. Measuring photosynthesis and res-piration of foliage[M]//Lassoie J P, Hinckley T, ed. Techniques and Approaches in Forest Tree Ecophysiology. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 1991:303-328.
[4] Hayward G D, Miquelle D G, Smirnov E N, et al. Monitoring amur tiger populations:Characteristics of track surveys in snow[J]. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2002, 30(4):1150-1159.
[5] 侯建平. 提高总氮测定实验准确性方法研究[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2014(8):49-51. Hou Jianping. Research on improving the accuracy of total ni-trogen determination experiment[J]. Resource Conservation and Environmental Protection, 2014(8):49-51.
[6] 赵芹, 杨俊志. 测量准确度及相关术语辨析[J]. 测绘科学, 2011, 36(1):75-76. Zhao Qin, Yang Junzhi. Analysis of measurement accuracy and related terms[J]. Surveying Science, 2011, 36(1):75-76.
[7] Ofria C, Wilke C O. Avida:A software platform for research in computational evolutionary biology[J]. Artificial Life, 2004, 10(2):191-229.
[8] Bennington J B, Rutherford S D. Precision and reliability in pa-leocommunity comparisons based on cluster-confidence inter-vals:How to get more statistical bang for your sampling buck[J]. Palaios, 1999, 14(5):506-515.
[9] Momeni B, Chen C, Hillesland K L, et al. Using artificial sys-tems to explore the ecology and evolution of symbioses[J]. Cel-lular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2011, 68:1353-1368.
[10] Murray J D. Mathematical biology I:An introduction[M]. 3rd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York:Springer, 2007.
[11] Balagadde F K, Song H, Ozaki J, et al. A synthetic Escherich-ia coli predator-prey ecosystem[J]. Molecular Systems Biolo-gy, 2008, 4(1):187.
[12] Walter A, Lambrecht S C. Biosphere 2 center as a unique tool for environmental studies[J]. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 2004, 6(4):267-277.
[13] Babak Momeni, Chi-Chun Chen, Kristina L Hillesland, et al. Using artificial systems to explore the ecology and evolution of symbioses[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2011, 68:1353-1368.
