Critical concepts of MBSE are articulated and main obstacles for traditional system engineering approach are analyzed. On the basis of the analysis, two original incentives of the development of MBSE, cost and demand, are demonstrated. Finally, two probable boosters for MBSE's development are proposed as future R&D paradigm transition and AI-based knowledge exploitation technology.
[1] ISO 15288. System and software engineering-system life cycle processes[S]. Geneva:ISO, 2015.
[2] 栾恩杰, 陈红涛. 工程系统与系统工程[J]. 工程研究, 2016, 8(5):480-490.
[3] Cloutier R. Current modeling trends in systems engineering[J]. Insight, 2015, 8(2):12-13.
[4] Giachetti R E. Design of enterprise systems:Theory, architec-ture, and methods[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 2010.
[5] Friedenthal S, Moore A, Steiner R. A practical guide to sysml[M]. 3rd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2015.
[6] Object Management Group. OMG systems modeling language (OMG SysMLTM).V1.4[EB/OL]. (2017-03-01)[2018-11-01]. http://www.omg.org/spec/SysML.
[7] Standard for Integration Definition for Function Modeling. Draft federal information processing standards[S]. Gaithersburg:Na-tional Institute of Standards and Technology, 1993:183.
[8] Modelica Association. Modelica specification[EB/OL]. (2017-07-04)[2018-10-02]. https://www.modelica.org/documents.
[9] Hoffmann H P. Harmony-SE/SysML deskbook:Model-based systems engineering with rhapsody Rev. 1.51[G]. Telelogic AB, 2006-03-24.
[10] Ingham M D, Rasmussen R D, Bennett M B, et al. Generating requirements for complex embedded systems using state analy-sis[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2006, 58(12):648-661.
