With the existence of the time and the space and the existence of the scale, we may infer the existence of the temporal and spatial scales of the ecological experimental objects (in the ontological sense, also called the "eigen scales"). The basic principle of understanding the spatio-temporal scale of the ecological experimental objects is to make the "spatio-temporal operational scale of the ecological experimental objects" (in the methodological sense, also called the "representational scale") correspond to the spatio-temporal scale of the ecological experimental objects (in the epistemological sense).This is the realism of the time-space scale relevance of the ecological experiments. In the process of specific ecological experiments, some ecologists either insist that the spatio-temporal scale of the ecological experimental objects does not exist, or insist that although they exist, they cannot be recognized, thus they are in the position of the instrumentalism and the empirical constructivism (as opposed to the realism). This position is at odds with the fundamental tenet of the ecological understanding-the understanding of the relationship between the living things and the environment in nature, and should be abandoned. Moreover, some ecologists have difficulties in understanding the spatiotemporal scale of the ecological experimental objects, or have the feeling of out of the picture without publishing, or for other reasons, they go to simplify the space-time scale of the ecological experiment object into the Newton's absolute space-time view, instead of the Einstein's relativistic space-time view, Prigogine's "inner-time" and even the extended "inner-space" space-time view, and the Leibniz's "space view" and even the extended "time view" of the relationship. The right "granularity" and "amplitude" are not properly considered to carry out the experiment, with the error of "improper use". Insufficient multi-scale analysis often results in "aggregation bias". Without an appropriate model, we come to the position of the "mousetrap for the elephant". The "characteristic scale" is not correctly identified, resulting in the "ecological fallacy". In view of the above shortcomings, the ecological experimenters should adhere to the correct view of the time and the space and take various measures for a correct understanding of the scale of the objects of the ecological experiments.
XIAO Xianjing
. The basic principle of spatio-temporal scale identification in ecological experiment: The operational scale of experimental objects is compatible with its own scale[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2019
, 37(24)
: 89
-99
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2019.24.011
[1] 肖显静. 生态学实验实在论——如何获得真实的实验结果[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2018.
[2] 康德. 康德著作全集(第2卷)[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2004:412.
[3] 张娜. 景观生态学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2014:18.
[4] 孙贤斌, 刘红玉, 张晓红, 等. 斑块尺度湿地植物群落多样性的维持能力[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(3):579-585.
[5] 肖显静, 林祥磊. 生态学实验的"自然性"特征分析[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2018(3):10-17.
[6] David W C, John R S, John E B, et al. Determination of ecological scale[J]. Landscape Ecology, 1989, 2(4):203-213.
[7] 姚依强. 华北落叶松树干液流速率主要影响因子及关系的时间尺度变化[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017(2):155-161.
[8] Wiens, Allen, Hoekstra, et al. Spatial scaling in ecology[J]. Functional Ecology, 1989, 3:385-397.
[9] Allen T F H, Hoekstra T W. Role of heterogeneity in scaling of ecological systems under analysis[C]//Kolasa, Pickett S T A, ed. Ecological Heterogeneity. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1991:47-68.
[10] 张娜. 生态学中的尺度问题:内涵与分析方法[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 6(7):2340-2355.
[11] Englund G, Cooper S D. Scale effects and extrapolation in ecological experiments[J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 2003(33):161-213.
[12] Chave J. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology:What have we learned in 20 years[J]. Ecology Letters, 2013(16):4-16.
[13] Petersen J E, Hastings A. Dimensional approaches to scaling experimental ecosystems:Designing mousetraps to catch elephants[J]. The American Naturalist, 2001,157(3):324-333.
[14] 邬建国. 景观生态学——格局、过程、尺度与等级[M]. 第2版. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2007:19.
[15] Dungan J L, Perry J N, Rale M R T, et al. A balance view of scale in spatial statistical analysis[J]. Ecography, 2002(25):626-640.
[16] Michael K W, John E P, Robert H G. Scale-dependence and the problem of extrapolation implications for experimental and natural coastal ecosystems[C]//Robert H G, Michael K W, Victor S K, et al. Scaling Relations in Experimental Ecology. New York:Columbia University Press, 2001:10-12.
[17] Taylor P, Haila Y. Situatedness and problematic boundaries:Conceptualizing life' complex ecological context[J]. Biology and Philosophy, 2001(16):521-532.
[18] Turner M G, Gardner R H, Neill R V. Landscape ecology in theory and practice[M]. New York:Springer-Verlag, 2001:22-34.
[19] Allen T F H, Starr T B. Hierarchy:Perspectives for ecological complexity[M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press, 1982:18.
[20] Levin S A. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology[J]. Ecology, 1992, 73(6):1943-1967.
