In the past 70 years, the achievements of education in New China have been remarkable, but there are also some problems. The statement of "QIAN Xuesen's question" after 2009 has gradually become the core issue of Chinese education. However, a careful analysis of the original text of QIAN Xuesen's conversation reveals that he has not raised any doubts and asked questions that need to be answered by future generations. He pointed out that studying the talent training model of universities such as Caltech can solve the problems of Chinese higher education. In fact, China also has a precedent for successfully cultivating innovative talents. PENG Huanwu was a model for cultivating outstanding scientific and technical personnel. Studying and learning from PENG Huanwu's successful experience in cultivating innovative talents is conducive to cultivating more outstanding scientific and technological talents for China.
HOU Yude
. Did Qian Xuesen really have doubts about the education of China ten years ago[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2019
, 37(24)
: 122
-126
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2019.24.014
[1] 钱学森. 钱学森的最后一次系统谈话——谈科技创新人才的培养问题[N]. 人民日报, 2009-11-05(11).
[2] 温家宝. 钱学森之问对我是很大刺痛[EB/OL].[2019-08-18]. https://edu.qq.com/a/20100505/000104.htm
[3] 杨振宁. 曙光集[M]. 翁帆, 编译. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2008:389.
[4] 马大猷. 以科学的方法领导科研事业[J]. 群言, 2000(9):1.
[5] 靳晓燕, 齐芳."钱学森之问"引发的思考[N]. 光明日报, 2009-12-05(1).
[6] 中国科学院理论物理研究所, 北京应用物理与计算数学研究所. 百年彭桓武:"默默无闻"的大师[J]. 军工文化, 2015(11):52-57.
[7] 于敏. 新中国理论物理与核科学理论的奠基人:于敏发言[J]. 物理通报, 2005(9):4-5.
[8] 黄祖洽. 三杂集[M]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2004:93.
[9] 钱尚武. 缅怀彭桓武老师[J]. 大学物理, 2007, 26(4):2.
[10] 黄祖洽. 黄祖洽文存[M]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2002:177.
[11] 薛继军. 大家之理论物理学家彭桓武[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 2005:69-76.
[12] 朱光亚. 学习彭桓武, 培养创新性人才[J]. 物理, 2006, 35(12):991-992.
[13] 郑绍唐. 回忆彭桓武对核武器事业和物理科学的贡献[J]. 现代物理知识, 2014, 26(4):13.
