The comprehensive risk assessment of COVID-19 is a key approach to the comprehensive epidemic risk management while the assessment method is the key to the epidemic risk assessment. This paper uses the public security "triangular model" and considers the three factors, i.e., the incident(the hazard of the virus itself), the vulnerability of hazard-affected carriers(the vulnerability of vulnerable groups), and the effectiveness of emergency management to establish a multidimensional risk assessment method, which can help to provide effective method for the next epidemic response and plans of resource allocation. According to the assessment results, the top five provinces with highest comprehensive risk are respectively Hubei, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Beijing and Guangdong. Within Hubei province, the top four cities are Wuhan, E'zhou, Xiaogan and Huanggang.
YUAN Hongyong
,
CHEN Tao
,
HUANG Lida
,
SU Guofeng
,
HUANG Quanyi
,
DAI Jiakun
,
YU Shuiping
. Analysis and comparison of comprehensive risk index of COVID-19 in China and Hubei province[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2020
, 38(4)
: 21
-28
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.04.003
[1] 肖庆昕, 吕志军, 秦军, 等. 世界重要传染病传入我国的风险性与危害性分析[J]. 口岸卫生控制, 2002, 7(4):19-24.
[2] 卢钟山, 李平, 田桢干, 等. 国际邮轮传染病疫情事件风险识别与评估报告[J]. 中国国境卫生检疫杂志, 2013, 36(1):60-64.
[3] 范维澄, 刘奕, 翁文国. 公共安全科技的"三角形"框架与"4+1"方法学[J], 科技导报, 2009, 27(6):3.
[4] Chowell G, Hengartner N W, Castillo-Chavez C, et al. The basic reproductive number of Ebola and the effects of public health measures:The cases of Congo and Uganda[J]. Journal of theoretical biology, 2004, 229(1):119-126.