Exclusive: Theory and Practice of Chinese Geography

Geosystems and geogovernance

  • CAO Xiaoshu
Expand
  • Global Regional and Urban Research Institute, Natural Resources and National Land Use Research Institute, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China

Received date: 2020-03-04

  Revised date: 2020-05-14

  Online published: 2020-08-05

Abstract

As an independent scientific system, the geoscience has experienced the transformation from the geography to the meaningful geoscience. The transformation of its research paradigm is reflected in three aspects: the integration of the whole scientific field and the intersection of the natural science, the social science, the humanity science, the management science, the technical science, the engineering science; the coupling integration and the system simulation of multi-source data of geoelements; the whole chain from the basic research to the applied research. The core of the basic research of the geoscience is the geosystem, which is composed of the geoelements, the geospace and the human-natural system with its unique system structure and functions, including the earth surface system, the land use system, the human activity system and the humannatural coupling systems. The core of the applied research of the geoscience is the geogovernance. Geogovernance is an important part of the national governance system and at present is mainly reflected in the land and space governance in the national governance system, including the general survey of the geoconditions and the geoevaluation, the geoplanning and the geodesign, the geosimulation, the geoengineering, the geomonitoring and the geowarning. The theory, the method and the technology systems should be innovated by Chinesescholars to make a greater contribution to the global sustainable development.

Cite this article

CAO Xiaoshu . Geosystems and geogovernance[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2020 , 38(13) : 32 -38 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.13.004

References

[1] Crutzen P J, Stoermer E F. The "Anthropocene"[J]. IGBP Newsletter, 2000(41):12.
[2] 刘东生. 第四纪科学发展展望[J]. 第四纪研究, 2003, 23(2):165-176.
[3] Cook B R, Rickards L A, Rutherfurd I. Geographies of the Anthropocene[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 53(3):231-243.
[4] Steffen W, Crutzen J, Mcneill J R. The Anthropocene:Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature[J]. Ambio A Journal of the Human Environment, 2008, 36(8):614-621.
[5] 刘东生. 全球变化和可持续发展[J]. 地学前缘, 2002, 9(1):1-8.
[6] Knitter D, Augustin K, Biniyaz E, et al. Geography and the Anthropeocence:Critical approaches needed[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 2019, 43(3):451-461.
[7] O'Riordan T. Future earth and tipping points[J]. Environment:Science and policy for sustainable development, 2013, 55(3):31-40.
[8] Wang C Y, Zhou T J, Lin Z, et al. Future earth activities in China:Towards a national sustainable development[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2015(6):84-91.
[9] Sandra van der H. New Science for global sustainabiity? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in future earth[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016(61):165-175.
[10] 陈发虎, 傅伯杰, 夏军, 等. 近70年来中国自然地理学与生存环境基础研究的重要进展与展望[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2019, 49(11):1659-1696.
[11] 傅伯杰. 地理学:从知识、科学到决策[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(11):1923-1932.
[12] 宋长青, 程昌秀, 杨晓帆, 等. 理解地理"耦合"实现地理"集成"[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1):3-13.
[13] 甄峰. 信息时代新空间形态研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2004, 23(3):16-26.
[14] 张之沧. 虚拟空间与"人、地、机"关系[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2015(1):5-12.
[15] Oleg A S. Geographic space:An ancient story retold[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2016(41):585-596.
[16] 曹小曙. 粤港澳大湾区区域经济一体化的理论与实践进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 27(5):120-130.
[17] 曹小曙. 丝绸之路经济带编织地球村新愿景[N]. 上海证券报, 2015-05-22(A01).
[18] 吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心——人地关系地域系统[J]. 经济地理, 1991, 11(3):1-6.
[19] 毛汉英. 人地系统优化调控的理论方法研究[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4):608-619.
[20] 钱学森. 现代地理科学系统建设问题[J]. 地理环境研究, 1989, 1(2):1-6.
[21] 郭东华, 王力哲, 陈方, 等. 科学大数据与数字地球[J]. 科学通报, 2014, 59(12):1047-1054.
[22] 郭东华, 陈润生, 徐志伟, 等. 自然科学与人文科学大数据[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(6):707-716.
[23] 樊杰. 中国人文地学70年创新发展与学术特色[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2019, 49(11):1697-1719.
[24] Carmody P, Hampwaye G, Sakala E. Globalisation and the rise of the state? Chinese geogovernance in Zambia[J]. New Political Economy, 2012, 17(2):209-229.
[25] 曹小曙. 基于人地耦合系统的国土空间重塑[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10):2051-2059.
[26] 龚健雅, 耿晶, 吴华意. 地理空间知识服务概论[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2014, 39(8):883-890.
[27] Marc A. From holistic landscape syntheses to transdisciplinary landscape management[M]. B. Tress, G. Fry & P. Opdam, (eds). From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning:Aspects of Integration, Education and Application, Netherlands:Springer, 2005:27-50.
[28] 郑新奇. 论地理系统模拟基本模型[J]. 自然杂志, 2012, 34(3):143-149.
[29] 梁留科, 陈太政. 地理科学的工程技术层次研究[J]. 河南大学学报, 1990, 20(4):63-67.
[30] 王铮, 吴必虎. PRED问题与地理工程[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 1992, 2(2):45-47.
[31] Thiele L P. Geoengineering and sustainability[J]. Environmental Politics, 2019, 28(3):460-479.
[32] 胡振琪, 王晓彤, 张冰松, 等. 2018年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2019年展望——土地工程与信息技术分报告[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(2):102-110.
[33] 李德仁, 丁霖, 邵振峰. 关于地理国情监测若干问题的思考[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2016, 41(2):143-147.
Outlines

/