The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a platform for countries to explore new international economic governance mechanisms, which was proposed by Chinese government in 2013. But the frequent natural disasters along the BRI countries seriously affect people's livelihood security and local economic and social development and become one of the important threats for the construction of BRI. Based on a literature review of existing disaster prevention and mitigation mechanisms, this paper analyzes the cooperation mechanism of cross-border natural disaster prevention and mitigation, and puts forward some suggestions. The study finds, (1) Cross-border disaster prevention and mitigation has gradually attracted research attention, but there are still long way to go in China. On the one hand, the international research is relatively mature, with a significant upward trend since 2010, and pays more attention to the role of geographic information technology and other technical means in the cross-border disaster prevention, and the establishment of an evaluation system to evaluate cross-regional disasters in order to improve the early warning mechanism for the disaster prevention and mitigation. On the other hand, Chinese researches mainly focus on measures and countermeasures based on the evaluation of the regional cross-border disaster prevention and mitigation, and the cooperation mechanisms for the cross-border disaster prevention and reduction. (2) The current cross-border major natural disaster prevention and mitigation mechanisms mainly include four aspects, namely, the international disaster reduction cooperation mechanism under the UN, the high-level interaction and diplomatic dialogue mechanism for disaster prevention and mitigation, the inter-country docking of the disaster prevention and mitigation framework and management system, and the sharing mechanism of disaster prevention and reduction technology. (3) In the future, China and the BRI countries should further promote cooperation in strengthening political mutual trust, building a comprehensive disaster prevention and mitigation platform, establishing cooperation and consultation mechanisms, and the sharing of disaster prevention and technology.
[1] 崔鹏, 胡凯衡, 陈华勇, 等. 丝绸之路经济带自然灾害与重大工程风险[J]. 科学通报, 2018, 63(11):989-997.
[2] 许闲."一带一路" 防灾减灾合作:挑战与应对[J]. 国际问题研究, 2017(1):33-44.
[3] Goodchild M F, Glennon J A. Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response:A research frontier[J]. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2010, 3(3):231-241.
[4] Devkota K C, Regmi A D, Pourghasemi H R, et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya[J]. Natural Hazards, 2013, 65(1):135-165.
[5] Popova O P, Jenniskens P, Emel'yanenko V, et al. Chelyabinsk airburst, damage assessment, meteorite recovery, and characterization[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6162):1069-1073.
[6] Hao Z C, Aghakouchak A, Nakhjiri N, et al. Global integrated drought monitoring and prediction system[J]. Scientific Data, 2014(1):140001.
[7] Tehrany M S, Pradhan B, Jebur M N. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014(512):332-343.
[8] Yokota Y, Ishikawa T, Watanabe S, et al. Seafloor geodetic constraints on interplate coupling of the Nankai Trough megathrust zone[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(7607):374.
[9] Lehner F, Coats S, Stocker T F, et al. Projected drought risk in 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C warmer climates[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017, 44(14):7419-7428.
[10] Kellens W, Terpstra T, de-Maeyer P. Perception and communication of flood risks:A systematic review of empirical research[J]. Risk Analysis, 2013, 33(1):24-49.
[11] Aerts J, Botzen W J, Clarke K C, et al. Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8(3):193-199.
[12] 辛方坤. 21世纪海上丝绸之路:生态风险及应对[J]. 太平洋学报, 2018, 26(7):59-70.
[13] 李永祥. 脆弱性视野下的缅甸防灾减灾研究[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2018, 348(12):85-91.
[14] 李永祥. 孟加拉国的自然灾害与防灾减灾研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 2018, 39(10):1-7.
[15] 李旭, 黄江成, 徐慧娟, 等. 怒江高山峡谷区泥石流堆积扇特征分析[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(05):750-757.
[16] 胡桂胜, 陈宁生, Khanal N, 等. 科西河跨境流域水旱灾害与防治[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(8):908-915.
[17] 李运刚, 何大明, 胡金明, 等. 红河流域1960-2007年极端降水事件的时空变化特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(11):1908-1917.
[18] 郑晓非. 辽宁部分河流流域面积变化与防洪工作分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2007, 14(3):40-41.
[19] 邢伟. 水资源治理与澜湄命运共同体建设[J]. 太平洋学报, 2016, 24(6):43-53.
[20] 程晓勇."一带一路" 背景下中国与东南亚国家海洋非传统安全合作[J]. 东南亚研究, 2018(1):99-114.
[21] 杨光, 腾跃, 舒立福, 等."一带一路" 沿线区域森林草原防火概述[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(6):82-88.
[22] 刘珉."一带一路" 与林业生态建设研究[J]. 林业经济, 2016, 38(11):22-29.
[23] 张继业. 日本推动东盟国家互联互通建设的政策分析[J]. 现代国际关系, 2017(3):53-61.
[24] 龙兴春, 兰江. 南亚区域合作中的功能主义实践及其局限[J]. 南亚研究季刊, 2009, 136(1):76-79.
[25] 刘磊. 莫迪执政以来印度海洋安全战略的观念与实践[J]. 国际安全研究, 2018, 36(5):98-119.
[26] 李泽红, 董锁成, 石广义. 关于制定"‘丝绸之路经济带’ 重大工程建设与安全科技支撑计划" 的思考[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2015, 30(1):37-45.
[27] 刘赐贵. 发展海洋合作伙伴关系推进21世纪海上丝绸之路建设的若干思考[J]. 国际问题研究, 2014(4):1-8.
[28] 陈乐福. 孟中印缅地区非传统安全合作探析[J]. 南亚研究季刊, 2016, 166(3):1-8.
[29] 谢永刚, 王建丽, 潘娟. 中俄跨境水污染灾害及区域减灾合作机制探讨[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2013, 22(4):82-91.
[30] 潘家华, 郑艳. 气候移民概念辨析及政策含义——兼论宁夏生态移民政策[J]. 中国软科学, 2014(1):78-86.
[31] 张杰, 包玉海, 马毅, 等. 基于中国自主卫星的东北亚跨境灾害遥感监测国际合作研究思考——以中蒙、中韩为例[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 48(4):481-487.
[32] 罗江华. 西部地区灾害管理的大数据建设与问题探析[J]. 管理世界, 2015, 12(4):176-177.
[33] 程玉. 论气候变化损失与损害的国际法规则[J]. 太平洋学报, 2016, 24(11):12-22.
[34] 李俊清, 聂玉霞. 推进云南公共安全治理体系和治理能力现代化研究[J]. 云南行政学院学报, 2018, 20(6):102-112.
[35] 曹海峰. 欧盟重大突发事件应急协调机制及其借鉴[J]. 中州学刊, 2016, 240(12):60-67.
[36] 钟开斌. 应对跨境突发事件——欧盟民事保护机制的经验与启示[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2013(5):112-116.
