The disruptive technology is an important force to achieve the breakthrough development of national scientific and technological innovation capabilities. Countries such as the United States and Japan have already planned for the development of the disruptive technology, and China is still in the initial exploration stage. By reviewing the experience of the disruptive technology financing in the major western developed countries, combined with the actual state of China's science and technology management, this paper finds that the bureaucracy in the scientific and technological plan management system, the traditional evaluation criteria and methods, and the attitude of "seeking quick success and instant benefits" of scientific research project management hinder the development of the disruptive technology in China. Based on the above review, this paper puts forward some suggestions, including the establishment of the special funded offices, the innovative science and technology project formation mechanisms and the funding methods, and the improvement of scientific and technological project management mechanisms, for science and technology managers at all levels.
YE Xiaogang
,
ZOU Qianyu
,
KANG Jinxia
,
YOU Yu
. Funding of disruptive technology: The foreign experience and China's program[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021
, 39(2)
: 96
-103
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.02.020
[1] 王武军. 颠覆性技术的"摇篮" 高明在哪儿[N]. 光明日报, 2016-05-06(11).
[2] Christensen C. The innovator's dilemma:When new technologies cause great firms to fail[M]. Cambridge:Harvard Business Review Press, 2013:5-23.
[3] 刘秋艳, 吴新年. 国内外颠覆性技术发现方法研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(7):127-136.
[4] Walsh S T, Linton J D. Infrastructure for emergent industries based on discontinuous innovation[J]. Engineering Management Journal, 2000, 12(2):23-31.
[5] Yu D, Hang C C. A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory[J]. International Journal of Management Review, 2010, 12(4):435-452.
[6] Tellis G J. Disruptive technology or visionary leadership[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2006, 23(1):34-38.
[7] Huang X, Sošić G. Analysis of industry equilibria in models with sustaining and disruptive technology[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(1):238248.
[8] Rafii F, Kampas P J. How to identify your enemies before they destroy you[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2002, 80(11):115-123.
[9] Danneels E. Disruptive technology reconsidered:A critique and research agenda[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2004, 21(4):246-259.
[10] 荆象新, 锁兴文, 耿义峰. 颠覆性技术发展综述及若干启示[J]. 国防科技, 2015, 36(3):11-13.
[11] 马利彬. 颠覆性技术筛选评估重点问题研究[D]. 北京:军事科学院, 2018.
[12] 卢光松, 卢平. 企业颠覆性技术路线图制定研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(11):81-86.
[13] 克雷顿·克里斯藤森. 创新者的窘境[M]. 吴潜龙, 译. 南京:江苏人民出版社, 2001.
[14] 孙启贵, 邓欣, 徐飞. 破坏性创新的概念界定与模型构建[J]. 科技管理研究, 2006(8):175-178.
[15] Prabhakar A. Breakthrough technologies for national security[Z]. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Technical Report, 2015.
[16] 窦超, 代涛, 李晓轩, 等. DARPA颠覆性技术创新机制研究——基于SNM理论的视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(6):99-108.
[17] 智强, 林梦柔. 美国国防部DARPA创新项目管理方式研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015(10):12-22.
[18] 贾珍珍, 曾华锋, 刘戟锋. 美国颠覆性军事技术的预研模式, 管理与文化——以美国国防高级研究计划局(DARPA)为例[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2016, 32(1):41-45.
[19] Bonvillian W B, Van Atta R. ARPA-E and DARPA:Applying the DARPA model to energy innovation[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2011, 36(5):469.
[20] 中国科协创新战略研究院. 日本颠覆性技术创新计划研究要点[J]. 中国高新科技, 2017, 1(1):93-95.
[21] 彭春燕. 日本设立颠覆性技术创新计划探索科技计划管理改革[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2015(4):141-147.
[22] 孟光. 俄先期研究基金会发展情况研究[J]. 现代军事, 2015(8):91-94.
[23] 马克斯·韦伯. 经济与社会(上)[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 1997:248.
[24] 吴集, 刘书雷, 刘长利. 从DARPA看新时代国家安全科技支撑体系的完善[J]. 科技导报, 2018, 36(4):1721.
[25] 杨卫, 郑永和, 董超. 如何评审具有颠覆性创新的基础研究[J]. 中国科学基金, 2017(4):3-5.
[26] Sainio L M, Puumalainen K. Evaluating technology disruptiveness in a strategic corporate context:A case study[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2007, 74(8):1315-1333.
