Think Tank

Characteristics of US marine science and technology policy and its enlightenment to China

  • CHEN Ning ,
  • ZHAO Lu
Expand
  • 1. Management College of Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;
    2. Auditing Bureau of Qingdao West Coast New Area, Qingdao 266100, China

Received date: 2019-03-18

  Revised date: 2019-05-30

  Online published: 2021-06-08

Abstract

The 21st century is the century of the ocean, and the prosperity and the decline of a country are very much related to the ocean. With a review of the marine science and technology policy of the United States since the Cold War, it is found that this policy has the characteristics of systematic coordination, wide coverage and prominent emphasis. In contrast, the development of China's marine science and technology policy and the marine development are not in very good shape, with a decentralized management system, the insufficient innovation and achievement and transformation capacity, with only a single channel of the fund input, the inadequate marine talent training, and the imperfect priority research plan. In order to realize the dream of becoming a powerful ocean country, we should strengthen the ability of the overall planning and the coordination in the policy formulation of the marine science and technology; improve the ability of the independent innovation and the conversion rate of the scientific and technological achievements; pay attention to the establishment of the multi-channel financing mechanism, the lifelong marine education and the high-end talent training; improve the priority research plans and strengthen the marine ecological and environmental protection.

Cite this article

CHEN Ning , ZHAO Lu . Characteristics of US marine science and technology policy and its enlightenment to China[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021 , 39(8) : 9 -16 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.08.001

References

[1] 张继先. 近二十年来美国海洋科学政策的演变[J]. 海洋通报, 1981(6):71-76.
[2] 于保华. 美国海洋科学技术发展趋势[J]. 海洋信息, 1998(6):13.
[3] 吴闻. 美国的海洋科技计划[J]. 海洋信息, 2001(4):22-23.
[4] 石莉. 美国海洋科技与管理[J]. 海洋信息, 2006(2):16-18.
[5] 肖小溪, 杨国梁, 李晓轩. 美国科技政策方法学(SoSP)及其对我国的启示[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(7):961-964.
[6] 乔俊果. 21世纪美英海洋科学战略比较研究[J]. 海洋信息, 2011(2):25-28.
[7] 陈俊, 同春芬. 美日中海洋政策及其政策工具刍议[J]. 科技管理研究, 2009, 29(7):110-112.
[8] 李晋, 蒋冰, 姜晓轶, 等. 海洋信息化规划研究[J]. 科技导报, 2018, 36(14):57-62.
[9] Bradford J F. The maritime strategy of the United States:Implications for Indo-Pacific sea lanes[J]. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2011, 33(2):183-208.
[10] Leitenberg M. The numbers game or ‘Who's on first’[J]. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2015, 38(6):27-32.
[11] Johnson E B. Review & forecast:The new congress must support our national ocean policy[J]. Sea Technology, 2017, 58(1):29-30.
[12] Wigand C, Ardito T, Chaffee C, et al. A climate change adaptation strategy for management of coastal marsh systems[J]. Estuaries & Coasts, 2015, 40(3):1-12.
[13] 黄军英. 美国联邦科技决策咨询的作用及典型案例研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(2):163-168.
Outlines

/