Committning to promote the reform and development of the national academic societies

International comparison on the development status of world class S&T societies: Based on the dynamic perspective of practice

  • MENG Fanrong ,
  • MA Tianxi ,
  • YUAN Meng ,
  • MEI Pingping ,
  • CHEN Guang
Expand
  • 1. School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China;
    2. Bureau of Academic Division, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received date: 2020-10-21

  Revised date: 2021-02-05

  Online published: 2021-06-09

Abstract

As the global science and technology innovation has entered a period of unprecedented activity, the importance of the S&T societies becomes increasingly apparent. With the momentum of the national efforts to promote the development of science and technology, it is important for Chinese S&T societies to expand their international perspective and to better appreciate the overall situation of the global S&T societies. This paper takes the world's top S&T societies as an example, traces and analyzes the professional development dynamics of the advanced international S&T societies, and reviews the development of the world's top S&T societies, to provide a benchmark for deepening the governance reform of Chinese S&T societies, and to further strengthen the vitality and the creativity of Chinese S&T societies. The conclusions are as follows:(1) the domestic S&T societies emphasize the party leadership and the institutional strengths that reflect a strong cohesion; (2) foreign S&T societies are better at aggregating public resources and transforming new knowledge into usable products and services, promoting the integration of science and technology with the economy, the innovation chain and the industrial chain; (3) foreign S&T societies are good at making their voices heard in a variety of ways, giving a full play of their role as a think tank for policy makers and decision makers. (4) Substantive activities in the global S&T governance should be led by large international S&T associations. Chinese S&T societies need to pay attention to the construction of policy-making advisory think tanks, provide technical support for major government decisions, improve academic exchange platforms, create a good ecology conducive for the S&T workers to contribute their wisdom to the economic integration of the S&T, and promote mutually beneficial and shared international S&T exchanges and cooperations.

Cite this article

MENG Fanrong , MA Tianxi , YUAN Meng , MEI Pingping , CHEN Guang . International comparison on the development status of world class S&T societies: Based on the dynamic perspective of practice[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021 , 39(10) : 80 -89 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.10.010

References

[1] 孟凡蓉. 科技社团理论研究现状和发展方向[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2020:80-85.
[2] 陈建国. 政社关系与科技社团承接职能转移的差异——基于调查问卷的实证分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2015(5):38-43.
[3] 秦向华, 秦仲, 戴文澜. 以会员发展与服务为核心的科技社团信息化发展策略研究——中国林学会信息化的实践与探索[J]. 学会, 2019(12):53-57.
[4] 林昆仑, 陈幸良. 科技社团助力精准扶贫的成效、困境与对策研究——基于全国10个省(区)的实地调查[J]. 学会, 2020(8):49-54, 58.
[5] 2020世界一流科技社团评价报告[EB/OL]. (2020-08-10)[2020-09-28]. http://www.wstsrs.org/news/view/7
[6] 托马斯·库恩. 科学革命的结构[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2004.
[7] 许向阳. 我国科技社团国际战略初探[J]. 中国科技产业, 2004(7):52-55.
[8] 杨文志. 解析科技社团的发展历程[J]. 学会, 2005(3):14-16.
[9] 潘教峰, 刘益东, 陈光华, 等. 世界科技中心转移的钻石模型——基于经济繁荣、思想解放、教育兴盛、政府支持、科技革命的历史分析与前瞻[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(1):10-21.
[10] 孟凡蓉. 科技社会组织应在公共危机治理中发挥更大作用[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(3):398-399.
[11] 央广网. 习近平主持召开科学家座谈会并发表重要讲话[EB/OL]. (2020-09-12)[2020-09-28]. http://china.cnr.cn/news/20200912/t20200912_525251503.shtml
[12] 孟凡蓉, 李思涵, 陈子韬. 夯实科技社团理论研究, 助力科技创新跨越发展[J]. 科技导报, 2019, 37(12):14-19.
Outlines

/