Suggestions

Impact of resource tax law on the geothermal industry in China and corresponding policy suggestions

  • SHAO Haibing ,
  • KONG Yanlong ,
  • SHEN Baixin
Expand
  • 1. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany;
    2. Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;
    3. Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;
    4. College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    5. National Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Health and Protection in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River, Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Environmental Science, Nanjing 210036, China

Received date: 2020-12-20

  Revised date: 2021-05-15

  Online published: 2021-11-08

Abstract

Since the implementation of the "Resource Tax Law of the People's Republic of China" on September 1, 2020, a significant response is seen from the Chinese geothermal industry. Through the study of the law and the corresponding local implementation guidelines, it is found that there exist several conflicts between the current local implementation guidelines and the upper law. More specifically, when the resource tax is imposed on the amount of the reinjected geothermal water, such taxation practice will violate the upper law, against the third article of the principle of the tax on the amount of sales, as well as against the fifth article of the principle of the exemption on the self-usage for continuous production. These conflicts will very likely lead to judicial litigations and law suits in the future. With respect to the concept of"raw geothermal water"in the Resource Tax Law, and whether the reinjected geothermal water can be treated as a behavior of sales, the current legal definition is not clear enough. Moreover, the method of adopting the volume unit of the cubic meter as the taxation unit of the geothermal water will cause uncertainty and non-uniqueness in the measurement of taxable products in the geothermal electricity generation industry. In terms of policy recommendations, this paper proposes that the resource tax should be exempted on the reinjected geothermal water under the existing legal framework. At the same time, the definition of"raw geothermal water"needs to be clarified through judicial interpretation, and a revision process should be initiated to change the taxation unit of geothermal water to the mass unit of ton.

Cite this article

SHAO Haibing , KONG Yanlong , SHEN Baixin . Impact of resource tax law on the geothermal industry in China and corresponding policy suggestions[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021 , 39(20) : 33 -44 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.20.003

References

[1] 侯晓靖. 资源税费制度的国际比较及对中国的借鉴——以资源节约性经济为视角[J]. 特区经济, 2007(12):128-130.
[2] 罗飞娜, 叶苗, 谢毅. 国外水资源税分析与经验借鉴[J]. 国际税收, 2016(7):19-23.
[3] 曹明德. 矿产资源生态补偿法律制度之探究[J]. 法商研究, 2007(2):17-24.
[4] 武辉, 钱春杰, 段培山. 企业生产的税收规划[J]. 财务与会计, 2006(14):43-45.
[5] 潘峰. 中国开征地热资源税研究[D]. 济南:山东财经大学财政税务学院, 2017.
[6] 北京市人民代表大会常务委员会关于北京市资源税具体适用税率等事项的决定[J]. 北京人大, 2020(8):15.
[7] 地热能术语:NB/T 10097-2018[S]. 北京:国家能源局, 2018:1-23.
[8] 国家税务总局. 关于发布《煤炭资源税征收管理办法(试行)》 的公告[Z]. 2015.
[9] 汪集暘, 庞忠和, 孔彦龙, 等. 中国地热清洁取暖产业现状与展望[J]. 科技促进发展, 2020, 16(增刊1):294-298.
[10] 庞忠和, 庞菊梅, 孔彦龙, 等. 大型岩溶热储识别方法与规模化可持续开采技术[J]. 科技促进发展, 2020, 16(增刊1):299-306.
[11] 孔彦龙, 庞忠和, 邵亥冰, 等. 面向成本的中深层地热储群井采灌优化布局研究[J]. 科技促进发展, 2020, 16(增刊1):316-322.
[12] 可再生能源发展"十三五" 规划[J]. 太阳能, 2017(1):78.
[13] 地热能开发利用"十三五" 规划[J]. 宁波节能, 2017(1):4-12.
[14] 唐伟.《北方地区冬季清洁取暖规划(2017-2021)》解读[N]. 国家电网报, 2018-01-09(008).
[15] Abidin M Z, Rosdiana H, Salomo R V. Tax incentive policy for geothermal development:Acomparative analysis in ASEAN[J]. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 20209(1):53-62.
Outlines

/