[1] Petroni F, Rocktäschel T, Lewis P, et al. Language models as knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). Hong Kong:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019:2463-2473.
[2] 刘峤, 李杨, 段宏, 等. 知识图谱构建技术综述[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2016, 53(3):582-600.
[3] Hoffmann R, Zhang C, Ling X, et al. Knowledge-based weak supervision for information extraction of overlapping relations[C]//Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies. Seattle, Washington, USA:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011:541-550.
[4] Bordes A, Weston J, Usunier N. Open question answering with weakly supervised embedding models[C]//Joint European conference on machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 2014:165-180.
[5] 徐增林, 盛泳潘, 贺丽荣, 等. 知识图谱技术综述[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2016, 45(4):589-606.
[6] Bordes A, Weston J, Collobert R, et al. Learning structured embeddings of knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, California USA:The AAAI Press, 2011:301-306.
[7] Bordes A, Usunier N, Garcia-Duran A, et al. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data[C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook, NY, USA:Curran Associates Inc., 2013:2787-2795.
[8] Weston J, Bordes A, Yakhnenko O, et al. Connecting language and knowledge bases with embedding models for relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Seattle, Washington, USA:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013:1366-1371.
[9] Nickel M, Tresp V, Kriegel H P. Factorizing yago:Scalable machine learning for linked data[C]//Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. Lyon, France:Association for Computing Machinery, 2012:271-280.
[10] Nickel M, Tresp V, Kriegel H P. A three-way model for collective learning on multi-relational data[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning. Madison, WI, USA:Omnipress, 2011:809-816.
[11] Bordes A, Glorot X, Weston J, et al. A semantic matching energy function for learning with multi-relational data[J]. Machine Learning, 2014, 94(2):233-259.
[12] Blog G O. Introducing the knowledge graph:Thing, not strings[J]. Official Google Blog, 2012:1-8.
[13] Ehrlinger L, Wöß W. Towards a definition of knowledge graphs[J]. Association for Computing Machinery, 2016, 48:1-4.
[14] Wang Q, Mao Z, Wang B, et al. Knowledge graph embedding:A survey of approaches and applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2017, 29(12):2724-2743.
[15] Turian J, Ratinov L, Bengio Y. Word representations:A simple and general method for semi-supervised learning[J]. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010(7):384-394.
[16] Wang Z, Zhang J, Feng J, et al. Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Québec City, Québec, Canada:AAAI Press, 2014:1112-1119.
[17] Lin Y, Liu Z, Sun M, et al. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Austin, Texas:AAAI Press, 2015:2181-2187.
[18] Socher R, Chen D, Manning C D, et al. Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion[C]//Twenty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States:Curran Associates, Inc., 2013:926-934.
[19] He S, Liu K, Ji G, et al. Learning to represent knowledge graphs with gaussian embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, NY, USA:Association for Computing Machinery, 2015:623-632.
[20] Xiao H, Huang M, Zhu X. TransG:A generative model for knowledge graph embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Berlin, Germany:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016:2316-2325.
[21] Mikolov T, Yih W, Zweig G. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 conference of the north american chapter of the association for computational linguistics:Human language technologies. Atlanta, Georgia:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013:746-751.
[22] Yoon H G, Song H J, Park S B, et al. A translationbased knowledge graph embedding preserving logical property of relations[J]. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016:907-916.
[23] Nguyen D Q, Sirts K, Qu L, et al. Stranse:A novel embedding model of entities and relationships in knowledge bases[J]. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016:460-466.
[24] Ji G, He S, Xu L, et al. Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. Beijing, China:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015:687-696.
[25] Ji G, Liu K, He S, et al. Knowledge graph completion with adaptive sparse transfer matrix[C]//Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Phoenix, Arizona:AAAI Press, 2016:985-991.
[26] Fan M, Zhou Q, Chang E, et al. Transition-based knowledge graph embedding with relational mapping properties[C]//Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing. Chulalongkorn University, Phuket, Thailand:Department of Linguistics, 2014:328-337.
[27] Xiao H, Huang M, Zhu X. From one point to a manifold:Knowledge graph embedding for precise link prediction[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. New York, USA:AAAI Press, 2016:1315-1321.
[28] Feng J, Huang M, Wang M, et al. Knowledge graph embedding by flexible translation[C]//Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Cape Town, South Africa:AAAI Press, 2016:557-560.
[29] Xiao H, Huang M, Hao Y, et al. TransA:An adaptive approach for knowledge graph embedding[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.05490, 2015.
[30] Zhi S, Zhi D, Jian N, et al. RotatE:Knowledge graph embedding by relational rotation in complex space[C]//Seventh International Conference on Learning Representations. ICLR. Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, New Orleans. 2019:1-18.
[31] Zhan Z, Jian C, Yong Z, et al. Learning hierarchy-aware knowledge graph embeddings for link prediction[C]//The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. New York, USA:AAAI Press. 2020:3065-3072.
[32] Jenatton R, Roux N, Bordes A, et al. A latent factor model for highly multi-relational data[C]//Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Lake Tahoe, Nevada:Curran Associates Inc., 2012:3167-3175.
[33] García-Durán A, Bordes A, Usunier N. Effective blending of two and three-way interactions for modeling multi-relational data[C]//Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 2014:434-449.
[34] Yang B, Yih W, He X, et al. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases[C]//International Conference on Learning Representations 2015. San Diego, CA, USA:Conference Track Proceedings, 2015:141-153.
[35] Nickel M, Rosasco L, Poggio T. Holographic embeddings of knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Phoenix, Arizona:AAAI Press, 2016:1955-1961.
[36] Plate T A. Holographic reduced representations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural networks, 1995, 6(3):623-641.
[37] Trouillon T, Welbl J, Riedel S, et al. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 48, JMLR.org, New York, NY, USA:ACM, 2016:2071-2080.
[38] Hayashi K, Shimbo M. On the equivalence of holographic and complex embeddings for link prediction[J]. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017:554-559.
[39] Liu H, Wu Y, Yang Y. Analogical inference for multi-relational embeddings[C]//Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning -Volume 70, JMLR.org. Sydney, NSW, Australia:ACM, 2017:2168-2178.
[40] Dong X, Gabrilovich E, Heitz G, et al. Knowledge vault:A web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion[C]//Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. New York, USA:Association for Computing Machinery, 2014:601-610.
[41] Liu Q, Jiang H, Evdokimov A, et al. Probabilistic reasoning via deep learning:Neural association models[C]//25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. New York City, NY, USA:Deep Learning for Artificial Intelligence, 2016:271-278.
[42] Dettmers T, Minervini P, Stenetorp P, et al. Convolutional 2D knowledge graph embeddings[C]//32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2018. New Orleans, Louisiana USA:AAAI Publications, 2018, 32:1811-1818.
[43] Dai Quoc Nguyen T D N, Nguyen D Q, Phung D. A novel embedding model for knowledge base completion based on convolutional neural network[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies, Volume 2(Short Papers). New Orleans, Louisiana:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018:327-333.
[44] Balažević I, Allen C, Hospedales T M. Hypernetwork knowledge graph embeddings[C]//28th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Munich, Germany:Springer, 2019:553-565.
[45] Wang Q, Huang P, Wang H, et al. CoKE:Contextualized knowledge graph embedding[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.02168, 2019.
[46] Yao L, Mao C, Luo Y. KG-BERT:BERT for knowledge graph completion[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.03193, 2019.
[47] Wang X, Gao T, Zhu Z, et al. KEPLER:A unified model for knowledge embedding and pre-trained language representation[J]. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021(9):176-194.
[48] Yu D, Zhu C, Yang Y, et al. JAKET:Joint Pre-training of Knowledge Graph and Language Understanding[C]//Eighth International Conference on Learning Representations. Formerly Addis Ababa ETHIOPIA:ICLR, 2020:1-11.
[49] Devlin J, Chang M W, Lee K, et al. Bert:Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies, Volume 1(Long and Short Papers). Minneapolis, Minnesota:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018:4171-4186.
[50] Zaremoodi P, Buntine W, Haffari G. Adaptive knowledge sharing in multi-task learning:Improving low-resource neural machine translation[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2:Short Papers). Melbourne, Australia:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018:656-661.
[51] Scarselli F, Gori M, Tsoi A C, et al. The graph neural network model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2008, 20(1):61-80.
[52] Schlichtkrull M, Kipf T N, Bloem P, et al. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks[C]//5th SemWebEval Challenge at ESWC 2018. Heraklion, Greece:Springer, 2018:593-607.
[53] Shang C, Tang Y, Huang J, et al. End-to-end structureaware convolutional networks for knowledge base completion[C]//The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA:AAAI Press, 2019, 33:3060-3067.
[54] Vashishth S, Sanyal S, Nitin V, et al. Compositionbased multi-relational graph convolutional networks[C]//Eighth International Conference on Learning Representations. Formerly Addis Ababa ETHIOPIA:ICLR, 2020:1-15.
[55] Xie R, Liu Z, Jia J, et al. Representation learning of knowledge graphs with entity descriptions[C]//The Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Phoenix, Arizona, USA:AAAI Press, 2016:2659-2665.
[56] Xiao H, Huang M, Meng L, et al. SSP:Semantic space projection for knowledge graph embedding with text descriptions[C]//The Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, California, USA:AAAI Press, 2017:3104-3110.
[57] Guo S, Wang Q, Wang B, et al. Semantically smooth knowledge graph embedding[C]//The 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1:Long Papers). Beijing, China:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015(1):84-94.
[58] Xie R, Liu Z, Sun M. Representation learning of knowledge graphs with hierarchical types[C]//The TwentyFifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). New York, USA:AAAI Press, 2016:2965-2971.
[59] Lin Y, Liu Z, Sun M. Knowledge representation learning with entities, attributes and relations[C]//The TwentyFifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). New York, USA:AAAI Press, 2016:2866-2872.
