National research institutions are an important part of the national strategic S & T forces. As a gathering place of strategic talents, national research institutions take the important responsibility of cultivating and properly using strategic talents. It is pointed out in this paper that the strategic talents of national research institutions have the characteristics of hierarchy, concentration, difference, and organization. Then the international experiences of three categories of national research institutions in the cultivation and the use of strategic talents are analyzed. The first category of national research institutions is in the science frontier of the world, the second category is in accordance with the national strategic needs, and the third category is adapted to the industry and market development needs. Finally, based on the current situation of Chinese national research institutions in terms of cultivating and using strategic talents, this paper suggests that we should bring into full play the national research institutions in cultivating and using strategic talents, explore the establishment of mission-oriented classified cultivation and use mode of strategic talents, and establish a more open mechanism for cultivating and using strategic talents. These suggestions will help realize the strategic goal of building a powerful China with talents in the new era.
XIAO Xiaoxi
,
DAI Tao
. The international experiences and implications of cultivating and using strategic talents in national research institutions[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022
, 40(16)
: 46
-54
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.16.006
[1] 白春礼.世界主要国立科研机构概况[M].北京:科学出版社, 2013.
[2] 张柏春.近现代中国的科技发展战略选择:1607-1966[J].战略与决策研究, 2006, 21(6):454-459.
[3] Hruby J M, Manley D K, Stoltz R E, et al.The evolution of federally funded research & development centers[EB/OL].(2011-01-07)[2022-06-20].http://www.fas.org/pubs/pir/2011spring/FFRDCs.pdf.
[4] 肖小溪, 代涛, 李晓轩.美国国家实验室的改革动向及启示[J].中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(3):376-382.
[5] DOE.The state of the DOE national laboratories[R].Washington DC:DOE, 2021.
[6] MPG.Nobel laureates of the Max Planck Society[EB/OL].(2021-10-06)[2022-04-20].https://www.mpg.de/nobelprize.
[7] 代涛.国立科研机构科技评价比较研究:基于机构战略定位的视角[J].科技促进发展, 2012(5):81-87.
[8] 日本学術振興会.WPI 10年のあゆみ[EB/OL].(2016-12-01)[2022-06-14].https://www.jsps.go.jp/j-toplevel/data/10thcommemoration.pdf.
[9] MPG.Max Planck Society annual report 2019[R].Berlin:MPG, 2020.
[10] RIKEN.Facts & figures[EB/OL].(2022-04-01)[2022-05-20].https://www.riken.jp/about/data/.
[11] 白春礼.人才与发展:国立科研机构比较研究[M].北京:科学出版社, 2011.
[12] CNRS.A year at the CNRS 2018[EB/OL].(2019-06-01)[2022-05-20].https://www.cnrs.fr/sites/default/files/news/2019-10/RACNRS2018EN2-min-formatx.pdf.
[13] 肖小溪, 周建中.国立科研机构科研人员评价的模式研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2009, 30(4):20-24.
[14] HPC.IBM & DOE launch COVID-19 high performance computing consortium[EB/OL].(2022-03-22)[2022-05-20].https://insidehpc.com/2020/03/ibm-doe-launch-covid-19-high-performance-computing-consortium.
[15] CSIRO.The development and administration of National Research Flagships[EB/OL].(2012-03-22)[2022-04-23].https://www.anao.gov.au/sites/default/files/ANAO_Report_2010-2011_47.pdf.
[16] NIH.NIH pay types[EB/OL].(2021-03-12)[2022-05-20].https://hr.nih.gov/benefits/pay/pay-nih.
[17] 杨国梁, 孟溦, 李晓轩.法国INRIA管理与评估实践分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2008, 29(12):6.
[18] AIST.AIST social and environmental report 2021[R].Tokyo:AIST, 2021.
[19] Fraunhofer.The Fraunhofer Model[EB/OL].(2018-04-26)[2022-05-20].https://www.janu.jp/eng/wp/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/20180426-jpde-presentation14.pdf.
[20] AIST.AIST social and environmental report 2017[R].Tokyo:AIST, 2017.
[21] The Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft.Fraunhofer annual report 2019[R].München:The Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, 2020.
[22] The Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft.Fraunhofer annual report 2020[R].München:The Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, 2021.
