With the rapid development of modern science and technology, while emerging science and technology brings about progress and well-being to human society, its potential uncertainty also makes various risks and crises increasingly apparent. This paper analyzes the historical causes of frequent scientific and technological ethical problems in China, and points out that these problems are not only the historical necessity of modern scientific institutionalization and professional development, but also the results of the disadvantages in the process of learning and catching up, At the same time, they are closely related to the ethical environment of different cultures between China and the West; It is concluded that the construction of scientific and technological ethics governance and the development of science and technology for human well-being are the only way for China to achieve a high-quality development of science and technology in the future and to maintain all-round competitiveness; In terms of the path selection, it is suggested that the development of science and technology should be synchronized with the ethical governance. In the overall position of a community with a shared future for mankind, the ethical governance should be used to promote the scientific and technological innovation. Through the detour of the ethical governance, we should accelerate the construction of a powerful country in science and technology and achieve self-reliance in high-level science and technology.
WANG Xiaoyan
,
XU Fei
. Ethical governance: The corner overtaking of modernization of Chinese science and technology[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022
, 40(18)
: 13
-20
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.18.002
[1] 科技部, 教育部. 部分教育、 医疗机构医学科研诚信案件 调查 处理 结果 [EB/OL]. (2022-03-18) [2022-07-20]. https://www.most.gov.cn/zxgz/kycxjs/kycxgzdt/202203/t20220318_179892.html.
[2] Piller C. Blots on a field? A neuroscience image sleuth finds signs of fabrication in scores of Alzheimer’ s articles, threatening a reigning theory of the disease[J]. Science, 2022, 377(6604): 358-363.
[3] Stigbrand T. Retraction Note to multiple articles in Tumor Biology[EB/OL]. (2017-04-20)[2022-07-22]. https://link. springer.com/article/10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6.
[4] 贝尔纳. 科学的社会功能[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1982: 34.
[5] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集（第1卷） [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 775.
[6] 中国中共党史学会．中国共产党历史系列辞典[M]. 北京: 中共党史出版社, 党建读物出版社, 2019.
[7] 葛业静, 徐飞. 现代中国自然科学研究国际化进程的历史反思[J]. 科技导报, 2022, 40(10): 144-152.
[8] 江晓原, 穆蕴秋. 科学出版乌托邦: 从开放存取到掠夺性期刊（上） [J]. 读书, 2018(8): 3-14.
[9] 钱钟书. 钱钟书作品集[M]. 北京: 中国工人出版社, 2003: 305.
[10] Grondin C, Cong Y L, Keshavarzi N, et al. Ethical perspectives of Chinese and United States physicians at initiation of a research collaborative[J]. Accountability in Research, 2022, 29(5): 294-308.
[11] 徐飞, 刘雯. 现代科技引发灾难的宏观趋势试探[C]//徐飞 . 走入科学技术学. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2011: 177-184.
[12] Branco M C, Rodrigues L L. Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008(83): 685-701.
[13] 徐天舒. 企业社会责任对企业竞争力影响的实证检验[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(9): 164-167.
[14] Defense Innovation Board. AI principles: Recommendations on the ethical use of artificial intelligence by the department of defense[EB/OL]. (2019-10-31)[2022-07- 20]. https://media.defense.gov/2019/Oct/31/2002204458/-1/-1/0/DIB_AI_PRINCIPLES_PRIMARY_DOCUMEN T.PDF.
[15] 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于加强科技伦理治理的意见》[EB/OL]. (2022-03-20) [2022-07-23]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2022-03/20/content_5680105.htm.
[16] European Commission. Responsible research & innovation[EB/OL]. (2014-01-31)[2022-07-25]. https://ec.europa.eu/info/research and innovation/funding/fundingopportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/ horizon-2020.
[17] World Economic Forum. Agile governance: Reimagining policy-making in the fourth industrial revolution [EB/ OL]. (2018-04-24) [2022-07-25]. https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/agile-governance-reimagining-policymaking-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution.
[18] 刘瑞琳, 陈凡. 技术设计的创新方法与伦理考量—— 弗里德曼的价值敏感设计方法论述评[J]. 东北大学学报 （社会科学版）, 2014, 16(3): 232-237.
[19] 方兴东, 钟祥铭. 国际传播新格局下的中国战略选择——技术演进趋势下的范式转变和对策研究[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2022(1): 70-81.
[20] 于雪, 凌昀, 李伦. 新兴科技伦理治理的问题及其对策[J]. 科学与社会, 2021, 11(4): 51-65.
[21] 谢尧雯, 赵鹏. 科技伦理治理机制及适度法制化发展[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(16): 109-116.
[22] 郭帅, 陈强, 贾婷, 等. 新形势下科技创新治理体系现代化的理论体系构建研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2022, 43(3): 24-42.
[23] 史东波, 周博文. 科研不端行为特征与治理对策[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(3): 106-110.
[24] 科学 技术 部. 中国 科研 诚信 网改 版上 线[EB/OL]. (2021-08-04) [2022-07-20]. https://www.most.gov.cn/kjbgz/202108/t20210804_176230.html.
