In order to uphold the scientific research integrity, China's related departments have issued a series of laws and regulations, and put forward guiding suggestions on the classification, the investigation procedures and the handling measures for the academic misconduct. The identification of the academic misconduct is the key link in the process from the investigation to the treatment, but it is difficult to formulate a generally applicable objective standard in identifying the academic misconduct. The identification very much depends on the subjective judgment of the academic community on the basis of the investigation. Based on a careful review , the influencing factors in the identifying process are analyzed, including the adequacy of launching conditions, the determination of the responsible persons, the effectiveness of the identified evidence, and the perspective of the identification. It is important to keep the subjective nature of the identifying mode in mind. It is suggested that the investigation and the identification should be carried out within the framework of laws and regulations to ensure the legitimacy of the procedures, protect the legitimate rights and interests of the persons concerned. A reliable identification conclusion should be drawn by the academic evaluation of the full investigation.
[1] 刘一玮. 学术不端行为的认定及其司法审查——以于艳茹案为切入点[J]. 河南教育学院学报（哲学社会科学版） , 2018, 37(3): 53-56.
[2] 郑政蓉. 剽窃的法律认定研究[D]. 北京: 中国政法大学法学院, 2010.
[3] 教育部. 高等学校预防与处理学术不端行为办法[EB/OL]. (2016-06-16) [2022-01-14]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A02/s5911/moe_621/201607/t20160718_272156.html.
[4] 科学技术部. 关于印发《科研诚信案件调查处理规则（试行）》的通知[EB/OL]. (2019-10-09)[2022-01-14]. http://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/gfxwj/gfxwj2019/201910/t20191009_149114.html.
[5] 国家自然科学基金委员会. 关于印发《国家自然科学基金项目科研不端行为调查处理办法》的通知[EB/OL]. (2020-12-29)[2022-01-14]. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab434/info79519.htm.
[6] 全国新闻出版标准化技术委员会. 学术出版规范——期刊学术不端行为界定（CYT174—2019）[EB/OL]. (2019- 07-01) [2022-01-14]. http://jw.beijing.gov.cn/kyc/zlxz_15523/201907/t20190718_1448554.html.
[7] 曹树基. 学术不端行为: 概念及惩治[J]. 社会科学论坛, 2005(3): 36-40.
[8] 常宏建, 方玉东, 陈越. 关于一稿多发界定的探析[J]. 中国科学基金, 2012, 26(6): 339-344.
[9] 中国 科研 诚信 网. 案件 通报 [EB/OL]. (2022-01-13) [2022-01-14]. https://www.orichina.cn/channels/6.html.
[10] 杨卫.“双一流” 建设的上行式评估[J]. 大学与学科, 2020, 1(1): 145-153.
[11] ICMJE. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals[EB/OL]. (2019-12-31)[2022-01-14]. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/.
[12] 国家版权局版权管理司. 关于如何认定抄袭行为给青岛市版权局的答复[EB/OL]. (1999-01-15)[2022-01- 14]. http://science.zuel.edu.cn/2018/0828/c588a197904/page.htm.
[13] 郭卫兵, 叶继元. 学术失范、 不端检测软件的功能、 局限与对策——以学术研究规范为视角[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2019(3): 2-9.
[14] 谢小瑶, 叶继元. 高校查处学术不端行为的双重困境与制度选择[J]. 南京大学学报（哲学·人文科学·社会科学） , 2016, 53(4): 70-83.
[15] 刘宇, 魏峰, 杜云飞. 重复发表与学术失范: 以经济管理学科为例[J]. 清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版） , 2020, 35(6): 189-198.
[16] 昌增益, 王志珍. 美国学术不端行为监管体系的建设及其对中国的启示[J]. 科技导报, 2015, 33(15): 12-13.
[17] 惠天灵. 如何认定抄袭、 剽窃行为[J]. 出版发行研究, 2012(3): 53-55.
[18] 伏创宇. 国家监督与大学自治框架中的学术抄袭认定[J]. 行政法学研究, 2020(2): 75-88.
[19] 徐靖. 科研失信行为处理的程序法治规则[J]. 高校教育管理, 2020, 14(3): 83-91.
[20] 高俊杰. 基于学术不端撤销学位的程序制度建构[J]. 中国法学, 2019(5): 47-63.
[21] 朱邦芬. 我国学术诚信问题的现状分析与应对策略[J]. 科学与社会, 2019(1): 34-40.
