Exclusive: Primary mineral product supply security strategy

The impact of US, Japan and Europe's strategy of reconstructing rare earth supply chain on China's counterpart

  • LAI Dan ,
  • FANG Wenlong ,
  • WU Yiding ,
  • TAN Jun
Expand
  • 1. School of economics and management, Jiangxi University of technology, Ganzhou 341000, China;
    2. Research Institute of Nonferrous Metal Industry Development, Jiangxi University of Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China

Received date: 2022-06-10

  Revised date: 2022-07-29

  Online published: 2022-11-30

Abstract

This paper combs the actions for the United States, Japan and Europe to restructure their rare earth supply chain, analyzes the motivation and possibility of the reconstruction, and identifies its impact on the development of China's rare earth industry. The following conclusions are drawn. 1) through reconstructing supply chain, the United States, Japan and Europe have initially established a rare earth resource supply chain system independent of China; 2) the theoretical basis of the reconstruction, which is a long-term strategy, is to maintain their comparative advantages in high-end rare earth applications, and the practical basis is to ensure supply security for their industries; 3) to reconstruct the rare earth supply chain, they continue to resume their rare earth mines, the pattern of rare earth supply being changed greatly and gradually becoming diversified and China's dominant position in the supply being gradually decreased; 4) according to the output of rare earth permanent magnet materials and the neodymium iron boron magnetic materials consumed by new energy vehicles, it is predicted that the demand for rare earth will reach more than 600000 t by 2030 while the supply will be only 350000 t, far less than the demand, and the gap will become larger and larger as time goes by. Moreover, corresponding suggestions are put forward for China to improve the competitiveness of its whole rare earth industry chain.

Cite this article

LAI Dan , FANG Wenlong , WU Yiding , TAN Jun . The impact of US, Japan and Europe's strategy of reconstructing rare earth supply chain on China's counterpart[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022 , 40(21) : 88 -99 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.21.009

References

[1] 沈保根. 加强稀土战略研究, 主动宣传中国稀土产业对全球可持续发展的贡献[J]. 科技导报, 2022, 40(8): 1-1.
[2] 叶仁荪, 吴一丁. 中国稀土战略开发及出口产业规制政策研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.
[3] 汤林彬, 汪鹏, 马梓洁, 等. 稀土产业链关键产品贸易网络演变及启示[J]. 科技导报, 2022, 40(8): 40-49.
[4] 毛克贞, 吴一丁, 张修志. 稀土产业管制研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2016: 49.
[5] 张杰. 中美战略竞争的新趋势、 新格局与新型“竞合” 关系[J]. 世界经济与政治论坛, 2020(2): 1-20.
[6] 高平风, 刘大成, 徐崧泽, 等. 美国关键矿产战略对中国稀土产业的影响研究[J]. 稀土, 2020, 41(3): 146-158.
[7] US Congress. National strategic and critical minerals production act of 2013[EB/OL]. [2019-09-18]. https://www.congress.gov/congressionalreport/113th-congress/housereport/138/1?overview=closed.
[8] US Federal Register. A federal strategy to ensure secure and reliable supplies of critical minerals[EB/OL].[2019- 09-18]. https://www.Federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/26/2017-27899/a-federal-strategy-to-en-sure-secure-and-reliable-supplies-of-critical-minerals.
[9] US Department of Commerce. A federal strategy to ensure secure and reliable supplies of critical minerals[R/OL]. [2019-09-20]. https://www.Courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/minerals-strategy.
[10] 高风平, 张璞, 刘大成, 等. 国际稀土市场新格局与中国稀土产业战略选择[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019(7): 63- 81.
[11] 渠慎宁, 杨丹辉. 制造业本地化、 技术反噬与经济“逆全球化” [J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(6): 42-60.
[12] 中国发布《关于中美经贸摩擦的事实与中方立场》 白皮书[J]. 党史文苑, 2018(11): 51.
[13] Chen A W, Chen J, Dondeti V R. The US-China trade war: Dominance of trade or technology?[J]. Applied Economics Letters, 2020, 27(11): 904-909.
[14] 杨飞, 孙文远, 程瑶. 技术赶超是否引发中美贸易摩擦[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(10): 99-117.
[15] 余振, 周冰惠, 谢旭斌, 等. 参与全球价值链重构与中美贸易摩擦[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(7): 24-42.
[16] 董琴.“逆全球化” 及其新发展对国际经贸的影响与中国策略研究[J]. 经济学家, 2018(12): 91-98.
[17] 阳结南. 拜登时代中美贸易摩擦前景展望[J]. 国际贸易, 2021(4): 40-48.
[18] 丁俊发. 中国供应链管理蓝皮书-2015[M]. 北京: 中国财富出版社, 2015.
[19] 丁俊发. 美国全球供应链安全国家战略与中国对策[J]. 中国流通经济, 2016, 30(9): 5-9.
[20] 孙海泳. 美国对华科技施压战略: 发展态势、 战略逻辑与影响因素[J]. 现代国际关系, 2019(1): 38-45.
[21] 林梦, 李睿哲, 路红艳. 实施供应链安全国家战略: 发达经济体样本解析[J]. 国际经济合作, 2020(4): 51-62.
[22] 李峥. 美国推动中美科技“脱钩” 的深层动因及长期趋势[J]. 现代国际关系, 2020(1): 33-40, 32, 60.
[23] 杨丹辉. 资源安全、 大国竞争与稀有矿产资源开发利用的国家战略[J]. 学习与探索, 2018(7): 93-102, 176.
[24] 许明, 杨丹辉. 中国稀有矿产资源产业的国际竞争力分析[J]. 东南学术, 2019(1): 111-122.
[25] 迈克尔·T·克莱尔. 资源战争: 全球冲突的新场景[M]. 童新耕, 之也, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2002.
[26] 郑国栋, 王琨, 陈其慎, 等. 世界稀土产业格局变化与中国稀土产业面临的问题[J]. 地球学报, 2021, 42(2): 265-272.
[27] Ju J D, Yang X B. Hicks theorem: Effects of technological improvement in the Ricardian model[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2009, 18(2): 239-247.
[28] Hicks J R. An inaugural lecture[J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 1953, 5(2): 117-135.
[29] Samuelson P A. Where Ricardo and mill rebut and confirm arguments of mainstream economists supporting globalization[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2004, 18(3): 135-146.
[30] 保罗·萨缪尔森, 秦棋. 自由贸易: 福兮?祸兮?[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2006(1): 64-69.
[31] Dixit A, Grossman D, Samuelson P. The limits of free trade[J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2005, 19(3): 241-244.
[32] Shachmurove Y, Spiegel U. The welfare of nations in a globalized economy[J]. The International Trade Journal, 2010, 24(3): 230-260.
[33] Bitzer J, Görg H, Schröder P J H. Can trade really hurt? An empirical follow-up on samuelson's controversial paper[J]. Economic Inquiry, 2012, 50(3): 724-738.
[34] Hong P F. China's economic prospects and Sino-US economic relations[J]. China & World Economy, 2006, 14(2): 45-55.
[35] 张成林, 张定胜, 龚六堂. 技术外溢、 比较优势和福利分析[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2013(5): 17-28, 155.
[36] 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组, 史丹. 工业稳增长: 国际经验、 现实挑战与政策导向[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(2): 5-26.
[37] 夏启繁, 杜德斌, 段德忠, 等. 中国稀土对外贸易格局演化及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(4): 976-995.
[38] 汪鹏, 王翘楚, 韩茹茹, 等. 全球关键金属-低碳能源关联研究综述及其启示[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(4): 669- 681.
[39] 杨丹辉. 全球产业链重构的趋势与关键影响因素[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2022(7): 32-40.
[40] 朱明刚, 孙旭, 刘荣辉, 等. 稀土功能材料2035发展战略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2020, 22(5): 37-43.
Outlines

/