Exclusive:Domestic Replacement Promotes Scientific and Technological Security

Industrial software innovation breakthrough path and incentive mechanism for domestic replacement

  • ZHOU Xiongwei ,
  • XIAO Yonglong ,
  • YANG Xinhao
Expand
  • Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410012, China

Received date: 2022-11-29

  Revised date: 2023-01-31

  Online published: 2023-04-23

Abstract

The realization of domestic replacement of industrial software is the key to the transformation of China's industrial system to high-end and intelligent. In response to the U. S. suppression of China's industrial software development, and to explore the road of domestic replacement of industrial software, this paper compiles the development status and the degree of domestic substitution for four types of industrial software: R&D design software, production control software, business management software and embedded software, and analyzes the problems of the various types of domestic industrial software from the aspects of“have”and“use”. It also reviews and summarizes the development history and learning experience of the world's industrial software powerhouses such as the United States, Germany and France. Focusing on the two aspects of "have" and "use", the paper proposes countermeasures to design innovation breakthrough path and build application incentive mechanism respectively. Finally, this paper systematically proposes multi-faceted policy recommendations for the replacement of industrial software.

Cite this article

ZHOU Xiongwei , XIAO Yonglong , YANG Xinhao . Industrial software innovation breakthrough path and incentive mechanism for domestic replacement[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2023 , 41(6) : 34 -46 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.06.004

References

[1] 江绍华 . 国内外工业软件产业创新发展研究[J]. 广东科技, 2021, 30(10): 70-73.

[2] 中国工业技术软件化产业联盟. 中国工业软件产业白皮书 (2020) [EB/OL]. (2021-06-09) [2022-11-22]. http://www.caitis.cn/newsinfo/1573724.html?templateId=100829.

[3] 代小龙 . 中国工业软件发展现状与趋势分析[J]. 软件导刊, 2022, 21(10): 31-35.

[4] 周冬福. 2021年中国工业软件行业发展现状分析,行业国产化程度亟待提升[EB/OL]. (2022-02-03) [2022-11-22]. https://www.huaon.com/channel/trend/781484.html.

[5] 黄昂瑾 . 我国连续 11 年位居世界第一制造业大国对世界 制 造 业 贡 献 比 重 接 近 30%[EB/OL]. (2021-03-01)[2022-11-22]. http://finance.cnr.cn/gundong/20210301/t20210301_525424380.shtml.

[6] 邵珠峰, 赵云, 王晨, . 新时期我国工业软件产业发展路径研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2022, 24(2): 86-95.

[7] 郭朝先, 苗雨菲, 许婷婷 . 全球工业软件产业生态与中国工业软件产业竞争力评估[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 42(2): 22-30.

[8] 彭志伟. 2021年中国EDA龙头企业华大九天与Cadence经营对比,国产 EDA 差距何在? [EB/OL]. (2022-08-02)[2022-11-22]. https://www.huaon.com/channel/trend/824492.html.

[9] 郭刚, 鲁金屏, 窦俊豪, . 我国工业软件产业发展现状与机遇[J]. 软件导刊, 2022, 21(10): 26-30.

[10] Maggi G. Technology gap and international trade: Anevolutionary model[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1993, 3(2): 109-126.

[11] 陶卓, 黄卫东 . 中国工业软件产业发展路径研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2021(4): 78-82.

[12] 王海成 . 从国家战略高度重视国产工业软件产业高质量发展[J]. 中国发展观察, 2021(14): 13-18.

[13] 肖源 . 我国工业软件突围路径探析[J]. 国家治理, 2022(7): 57-59.

[14] 林雪萍. 工业软件简史[M]. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社, 2021: 73-116.

[15] 吕龙德 . 工业软件强国的成功之路[J]. 广东造船,2020, 39(5): 13-15.

Outlines

/