The emerging technology management system is an important way to reduce negative effects of the technology. Many countries have made achievements in the research of technology governance strategy and practice in terms of of responsible innovation. However, the underlying logic behind technical governance remains unclear. This paper uses case analysis method to study the nanotechnology governance strategies and practice pathways in the United States, European Union and China. The results show that government plays a leading role in the emerging technology governance. National demand is the main driving force of governance objectives and strategies. "Balancing" the relationship between stakeholders is the main tool of governance in emerging technologies. Collaborative governance is the action orientation of emerging technology governance. The government is in the center of the emerging technology governance network structure. The governance structure evolves from "vertical" to "network" and the governance concept turns from adaptive governance to forward-looking governance.
LI Chong
,
ZHANG Tingting
. Logic and features: How to make responsible innovation technology governance possible——Case studies on nanotechnology governance in EU, US and China[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2023
, 41(7)
: 37
-46
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.07.004
[1] Fondazione Giannino Bassetti. Choices of science and choices of society[EB/OL]. [2022-12-20]. https://www.fon⁃dazionebassetti.org/it/focus/2003/04/scelte_della_scienza_e_scelte.html.
[2] Fondazione Giannino Bassetti. The science that generates'insecurity'[EB/OL]. [2022-12-20]. https://www. fondazionebassetti. org/it/focus/2003/04/la_scienza_che_genera_insicure.html.
[3] NNI. The national nanotechnology initiative[EB/OL]. [2022-12-20].https://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/nni_strategic_plan_2007. pdf?q=NNI_Strategic_Plan_2007.pdf.
[4] Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2012, 39(6): 751-760.
[5] 梅亮 . 责任式创新: 科技进步与发展永续的选择[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2018: 11-12.
[6] Schroeder D, Brown D S, Schrempf B, et al. Responsible, inclusive innovation and the Nano-Divide[J]. Nanoethics, 2016, 10(2): 177-188.
[7] 吕阳, 王健 . 基于负责任创新理念的胚胎植入前遗传学检测技术的伦理治理研究[J]. 医学与社会, 2022, 35(2): 129-134.
[8] 马诗雯, 王国豫 . 合成生物学的“负责任创新”[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(6): 751-762.
[9] 杨青峰, 任锦鸾 . 发展负责任的数字经济[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(7): 823-834.
[10] 廖苗, 高璐, 胡明艳, 等 . 从负责任创新到开放科学——雷内·冯·尚伯格访谈录[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 35(3): 14-27.
[11] 晏萍, 张卫, 王前 .“负责任创新”的理论与实践述评[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2014, 31(2): 84-90.
[12] 刘战雄, 夏保华 . 责任过度及其对负责任创新的启示[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2016, 32(7): 41-46.
[13] Stahl B C. Responsible research and innovation: Therole of privacy in an emerging framework[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2013, 40(6): 708-716.
[14] Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(91): 75-78.
[15] Owen R, Stilgoe J, Macnaghten P, et al. A Framework for Responsible Innovation[C]//Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: Wiley, 2013.
[16] Lindblom C E. The science of "muddling through"[J]. Public Administration Review, 1959, 19(2): 79-88.
[17] Bos J J, Brown R R. Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2012, 79(7): 1340-1353.
[18] Voss J P, Bauknecht D, Kemp R. Reflexive governance for sustainable development[M]. London: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006: 23-36.
[19] 杨素雪, 孙启贵 . 新兴技术的预期治理: 内涵、意义与过程[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(23): 47-53.
[20] 蔡晶晶, 毛寿龙 . 复杂“社会-生态系统”的适应性治理: 扩展集体林权制度改革的视野[J]. 农业经济问题, 2011, 32(6): 82-112.
[21] 黄斐 . 挑战不确定性: 实验主义治理的逻辑与实践—— 评 Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture[J]. 公共管理评论, 2016(1): 162-168.
[22] Charles F, Zeitlin J. Experimentalist governance in the european union: Toward a New Architecture[M]. Oxford: Oxford Press, 2010: 3-4.
[23] Abbott F M. Distributed governance at the WTO-WIPO: An evolving model for open-architecture integrated governance[J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2000, 3(1): 63-81.
[24] Wiek A, Lang D J, Siegrist M, et al. Qualitative system analysis as a means for sustainable governance of emerging technologies: The case of nanotechnology[J]. Science Direct, 2006, 16(2): 988-999.
[25] Wiek A, Binder C. Solution spaces for decision-making a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2005, 25(6): 589-608.
[26] Sheona A K, Gary S, Hilary R, et al. Foresight study on the risk governance of new technologies: The Case of Nanotechnology[J]. Risk Analysis, 2016, 36(5): 1006-1024.
[27] 苏敬勤, 李召敏 . 案例研究方法的运用模式及其关键指标[J]. 管理学报, 2011, 8(3): 340-347.
[28] 罗伯特·K. 殷 . 案例研究: 设计与方法[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2017: 142.
[29] 樊春良, 李玲 . 中国纳米技术的治理探析[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(8): 51-60.
[30] 罗纳德·伯特 . 结构洞: 竞争的社会结构[M]. 上海: 格致出版社, 2017: 18.
[31] 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006—2020 年)[EB/OL]. [2022-12-20]. http://www. gov. cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_240244.htm.
