As an important part of cultivating innovative talents and exporting scientific and technological achievements, academic departments have become the key factors affecting national scientific and technological competitiveness. Based on the five dimensions of resource cohesion, scientific research output, achievement transformation, international influence and talent guarantee, this paper constructs the "five forces evaluation" model, conducts a comparative study on the characteristics of scientific and technological activities of Chinese and American academic departments, and puts forward suggestions to strengthen the competitiveness of Chinese academic departments.
TAN Tianjiao
,
XUAN Zhaohui
. A comparative study of science and technology activities between Chinese and American academic departments[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2023
, 41(18)
: 101
-108
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.18.013
[1] 任晓亚, 张志强 . 主要科技领域国际权威奖项规律及其驱动因素分析[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(9): 881-893.
[2] 张志强, 田倩飞, 陈云伟 . 科技强国主要科技指标体系比较研究[J]. 中国科院院刊 , 2018, 33(10): 1052-1063.
[3] 刘国卿, 丁帆, 甄树宁 .“双一流”背景下高校科研机构评估体系建构——以清华大学科研机构评估为例[J]. 中国高校科技, 2021(增刊1): 9-12.
[4] 范旭, 李蓓黎 . 科研机构基础科研创新效率评价及提升研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(15): 117-126.
[5] 雷环, 钟周, 乔伟峰 .“双一流”建设背景下中美研究型大学“学科”发展模式比较研究[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2018, 39(6): 66-73.
[6] 李阳 . 基于比较视角的中美国家级实验室建设研究[D].长春: 吉林大学, 2021.
[7] 罗梓超, 李荣, 董晓晴 . 中美生命科学科研现状对比研究[J]. 科技智囊, 2021(9): 69-76.
[8] 任泽平, 连一席, 谢嘉琪. 中美科技实力对比: 全球视角[R/OL]. (2018-07-22) [2019-05-22]. https://finance.sina. com. cn/stock/stockptd/2018-07-22/doc-ihfqtahi9690392. shtml.
[9] 任泽平,连一席,谢嘉琪 .中美科技实力对比:关键领域视角 [R/OL]. (2018-10-27) [2018-07-25]. https://max. book118.com/html/2018/1027/7131112106001154.shtm.
[10] 任泽平, 连一席, 谢嘉琪 . 中美科技实力对比: 体制视角[R/OL]. (2018-10-31)[2018-10-31]. http://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/stockzmt/2018-10-31/doc-ihnfikvc9836510.shtml.
[11] 迈克尔·波特, 竞争战略[M]. 陈小悦译 . 北京: 华夏出版社, 1997．
[12] European Commission. European innovation scoreboard[EB/OL]. [2021-06-21]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_3048.
[13] Ackermann E G. Developing comparative bibliometric indicators for evaluating the research performance of four academic nutrition departments, 1992—1996: An exploratory study[J]. Bibliometrics, 2001: 185.
[14] 刘开振, 殷伟, 贾云飞. 高校科研机构评估的五个维度与启示[J]. 中国高校科技, 2021(增刊1): 4-8.
[15] 中华人民共和国教育部, 中华人民共和国科学技术部. 中国普通高校创新能力监测报告 2021[R]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2021.
[16] 美国大学技术经理人协会 . 美国专利转化报告 2020[R]. 华盛顿: 美国大学技术经理人协会, 2021.
