Under the guidance of the spirit of openness, it is of great importance to strengthen the deployment, investment and guidance in the field of open source, and to build an appropriate governance system based on the source code or hardware design information for the development of digital economy. This paper analyzes the basic logic of the development of open source, and expounds the international experiences in promoting the development of open source from the aspects of research and development support, demand-side policies supply, and ecological construction. On this basis, this paper studies the current situation of open source development in the United States from a comparative perspective, and holds that the United States has a relatively high voice in the field of open sources. It is claimed that, we should insist on the“integration into the world, independent open source”, clarify the restriction boundaries based on foreign open source platforms, explore open source development strategies, increase research support for collaboration, carry out open source deployment pilots and establish a security assessment framework, and complement the shortcomings of open source ecological construction.
GUO Tengda
,
ZHANG Mingxi
. Experience analysis and suggestions on promoting the development of open source software and hardware[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2024
, 42(2)
: 14
-19
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2024.02.002
[1] Moody G. Rebel code:Linux and the open source revolution[M]. New York:Basic Books, 2002.
[2] Naughton J. A brief history of the future:Origins of the internet[M]. London:Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1999.
[3] Pearson H E. Open source:The death of proprietary systems[J]. Computer Law & Security Review, 2000, 16(3):151-156.
[4] Guadamuz A. Technology transfer:Open licensing and developing countries[M]. Saarbrücken:LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2010.
[5] Open Source Initiative. History of the OSI[EB/OL]. (2018-10-01)[2020-05-06]. http://www.opensource.org/docs/History.php.
[6] Feller J, Fitzgerald B. A framework analysis of the open source software development paradigm[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty First International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2000). Atlanta, USA:Association for Information Systems, 2000:58-69.
[7] Powell A. Democratizing production through open source knowledge:From open software to open hardware[J]. Media, Culture & Society, 2012, 34(6):691-708.
[8] OSHWA. Open source hardware (OSHW) statement of principles 1.0[EB/OL]. (2016-01-01)[2021-12-20]. https://www.oshwa.org/definition.
[9] Asay M. Open source hardware:The problems and promise[EB/OL]. (2019-10-10)[2021-04-23]. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/open-source-hardware-the-problems-and-promise.
[10] Raymond E S. The cathedral and the bazaar:Musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary[M]. Sebastopol:O'Reilly Media, 2001.
[11] Pearce J M. Open-source lab:How to build your own hardware and reduce research costs[M]. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 2014.
[12] CNN. NSA key to windows:An open question[EB/OL]. (1999-09-04)[2021-03-28]. http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02.
[13] Cisco Security Advisory. A default username and password in WLSE and HSE devices[EB/OL]. (2011-12-10)[2021-04-30]. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20040407-username.shtml.
[14] Rogers E M. Diffusion of innovations(5th ed)[M]. New York:Free Press, 2003.
[15] GitHub. The state of the octoverse 2023[EB/OL]. (2023-11-8)[2023-12-01]. https://github.blog/2023-11-08-the-state-of-open-source-and-ai.
[16] Synopsys. Open source security and risk analysis report[R]. San Francisco:Synopsys, 2020.
[17] Wright N L, Nagle F, Greenstein S. Open source software and global entrepreneurship[R]. Boston:Harvard Business School, 2020.
[18] Merkey P. Beowulf History[EB/OL].[2021-06-07]. https://beowulf.org/overview/history.html.
[19] Nagle F. Why congress should invest in open-source software[R].Washington D. C.:Brookings, 2021.
[20] Nagle F. Government technology policy, social value, and national competitiveness[R]. Boston:Harvard Business School, 2019.
[21] Executive Office of the President Office of Management and Budget. Memorandum for the heads of departments and agencies[EB/OL]. (2016-08-08)[2021-4-18]. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2016/m_16_21.pdf.
[22] United States Department of Commerce. Source code policy[EB/OL]. (2016-01-01)[2021-10-13]. https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/media/files/2016/open_source_code_policy_final1.0_-_signed.pdf.
[23] United States Department of Energy. DOE federal source code policy. (2018-02-01)[2021-03-06]. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2018/02/f48/DOE-CODE-Software-Policy-20180130.pdf.
[24] United States Department of Defense. Clarifying guidance regarding open source software (OSS). (2009-10-16)[2021-01-04]. http://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/OSSFAQ/2009OSS.pdf.
[25] United States Government Accountability Office. Information technology:DOD needs to fully implement program for piloting open source software[EB/OL]. (2019-09-01)[2021-02-04]. https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/701285.pdf.
[26] Williams L C. The defense department released a longawaited update of policies governing its buying practices, with an eye to rapid technology acquisition[EB/OL]. (2020-09-09)[2021-03-02]. https://defensesystems.com/articles/2020/09/09/williams-dod-5000-update-acquisition.aspx.
[27] Brown E. DARPA drops $35 million on "Posh Open Source Hardware" project[EB/OL]. (2018-07-26)[2021-09-07]. https://www.linux.com/topic/embedded-iot/darpa-drops-35-million-posh-open-source-hardware-project.
[28] Congress Research Service. China's 14th five-Year plan:A first look[EB/OL]. (2021-01-05)[2021-03-25]. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11684.
