Science & Technology Review >

0 1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.09.01451

 Identification of age-inclusive spatial issues in large cities based on online public opinion and exploration of planning strategy: Take the main urban area of Wuhan as an example

Expand
  • School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received date: 2023-09-25

  Revised date: 2024-05-28

  Online published: 2024-07-16

Fold

Abstract

The concept of "all-age friendliness" is a nascent but profound topic that impacts the spatial quality and future development of cities. Addressing issues such as insufficient refinement and mismatches between age groups and spatial needs in current urban planning and construction, this study focuses on the main urban area of Wuhan as a research subject. Leveraging big data from online public opinion, combined with techniques such as natural language processing and geospatial statistical analysis, we identify critical spatial issues related to different age groups and their distribution characteristics. The results reveal that spatial issues related to all age groups vary in content and emphasis. Old communities, schools and their surrounding neighborhoods, as well as commercial and office areas, are prone to issues specifically related to certain age groups. Urban transportation spaces and residential areas undergoing renewal are more likely to encounter issues pertaining to all age groups. Conversely, blue and green public spaces represent the least problematic spatial types. Based on these findings, this study provides guidance for the nascent exploration of all-age friendly cities in China, focusing on two aspects: "supporting the use of specific age groups" and "facilitating shared access for all ages." This research contributes to the ongoing efforts in enhancing the urban spatial quality and inclusivity for all age groups.

Key words： all-age friendliness; online public opinion; issue identification; planning strategy

Cite this article

HE Hui, ZHANG Qinghao, LIU Chang, XIE Chuting, RONG Sheng .  Identification of age-inclusive spatial issues in large cities based on online public opinion and exploration of planning strategy: Take the main urban area of Wuhan as an example[J]. Science & Technology Review, 0 : 1 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.09.01451

References

[1] 窦晓璐, 约翰·派努斯, 冯长春. 城市与积极老龄化: 老 年友好城市建设的国际经验[J]. 国际城市规划,2015, 30 (3): 117-123. 

[2] 林瑛, 周栋. 儿童友好型城市开放空间规划与设计: 国 外儿童友好型城市开放空间的启示[J]. 现代城市研究, 2014, 29(11): 36-41. 

[3] 孟雪, 李玲玲, 付本臣. 国外儿童友好城市规划实践经 验及启示[J]. 城市问题, 2020(3): 95-103. 

[4] 陈竹萌. 基于代际共融的社区老年人服务设计研究[J]. 工业设计,2019(8): 75-77. 

[5] 崔琳琳.“全龄友好型城市”的城市行动[EB/OL]. [2024 04-15]. https://mp. weixin. qq. com/s/xatFrq3TXu_T9dAet⁃ wXjlA. 

[6] 吴志强. 城乡规划学科发展十大关键词（2023—2024） [EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/gRie⁃ IG1ntzqA59kX7Zv3SQ. 

[7] 汪劲柏, 常海兴. 全龄友好社区的“场景化”设计策略研 究: 以中部某市老旧小区连片改造设计为例[J]. 上海城 市规划, 2021(1): 38-44. 

[8] 李小云. 包容性设计: 面向全龄社区目标的公共空间更新策略[J]. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(11): 27-31. 

[9] 耿卓艺, 于婧妍. 全龄友好社区研究综述[J]. 北京规划 建设, 2022(6): 92-97. 

[10] Manchester H, Facer K. Towards the all-age friendly city [R]. Bristol: All-age-friendly city group, University of Bristol, 2014. 

[11] 于一凡. 建成环境对老年人健康的影响：认识基础与方 法探讨[J]. 国际城市规划, 2020, 35(1): 1-7. 

[12] 王冬, 韩西丽. 北京城中村儿童户外体力活动环境影 响因子分析: 以大有庄、骚子营邻里为例[J]. 北京大学 学报(自然科学版), 2012, 48(5): 841-847. 

[13] 何玲玲, 林琳. 学校周边建成环境对学龄儿童上下学 交通方式的影响: 以上海市为例[J]. 上海城市规划, 2017(3): 30-36. 

[14] 陈春, 塔吉努尔·海力力, 陈勇. 女性老年人肥胖的建 成环境影响因素及规划响应研究[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(4): 76-81. 

[15] Tess S, Angela R. Young and old serving together: Meet⁃ ing community needs through intergenerational partner⁃ ships[M]. Washington D C: Generations United, 2002. 

[16] Verena M, Sheri B. Fostering Knowledge Development and Exchange on Age-Supportive Communities[R]. To⁃ ronto: Centre on Aging, University of Manitoba, 2011. 

[17] 黎晗, 付本臣. 城市住区公共空间的代际互动行为模 式与环境支持[J]. 城市问题, 2021(5): 73-83. 

[18] 肖竞, 吕妍, 付梦娇, 等. 基于家庭生命周期代际协同 的城市旧住区“混龄更新”策略[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2022(6): 62-71. 

[19] 赵世磊. 基于全龄友好目标的铁路客站无障碍设计研 究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2024, 68(2): 199-203, 210. 

[20] 沈思栋, 郝培尧, 董丽, 等. 基于包容性理念的全龄友 好型植物景观设计策略[J]. 景观设计, 2022(5): 102 105. 

[21] 邹思聪, 张姗琪, 甄峰, 等. 全龄友好理念下的社区生 活圈公共服务设施评价与优化[J]. 城市与区域规划研 究, 2023, 15(1): 143-163.

[22] 邹思聪, 张姗琪, 甄峰. 基于居民时空行为的社区日常 活动空间测度及活力影响因素研究——以南京市沙 洲、南苑街道为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(4): 580 596. 

[23] 郭鑫, 陈宏飞, 杨喜平. 建成环境对城市不同年龄群体 活力的时空异质性影响研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2022, 38(1): 63-70, 78. 

[24] 刘毅. 网络舆情研究概论[M]. 天津:天津人民出版社, 2007: 53-54. 

[25] 唐涛. 基于大数据的网络舆情分析方法研究[J]. 现代情 报, 2014, 34(3): 3-6, 11. 

[26] 许鑫, 章成志, 李雯静. 国内网络舆情研究的回顾与展 望[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2009, 32(3): 115-120. 

[27] 左蒙, 李昌祖. 网络舆情研究综述:从理论研究到实践 应用[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(10): 71-78, 140. 

[28] 刘畅, 郭亮, 范在予. 基于网络舆情的特大城市交通问 题识别与治理对策探析:以武汉市为例[J]. 城市问题, 2022(6): 77-87. 

[29] 周恺, 张海涛, 夏依宁, 等. 社交媒体影响下的城市消 费空间新特征: 以小红书长沙“网红打卡地”为例[J]. 现代城市研究,2021, 36(9): 20-27. 

[30] 谢亚文, 李晓青, 周楷淳, 等. 城市旅游抖音关注度空 间分布及影响因素——以长江中游城市群为例[J]. 经 济地理, 2023, 43(2): 220-228. 

[31] 赵广英, 宋聚生. 城市用地功能混合测度的方法改进 [J]. 城市规划学刊, 2022(1): 51-58.

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

Contact

  • Add：No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing　 Postal Code：100081
  • Tel: +86-10-62138113　Fax: +86-10-62138113
  • E-mail：kjdbbjb@cast.org.cn

    • Visited

      Total visitors:
      Visitors of today:
      Now online:
    Copyright © Science & Technology Review, All Rights Reserved.