Brain-Computer interfaces enabling intelligence activities, real Risks, and compliance protection

Expand
  • 1. School of Law, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China 

    2. Guangdong Yangchun City People's Procuratorate, Yangchun 529699, China

Received date: 2024-01-04

  Revised date: 2024-05-18

  Online published: 2024-07-17

Abstract

As a mainstream science and technology in the new era, brain-computer interface has been widely used in education, medical, military, business and other fields, and has many functions such as "non-contact information dissemination", "deep reinforcement of human body functions", "efficient data transmission", etc. for enabling intelligence activities. The "non-contact information dissemination", "deep enhancement of human body functions", "efficient data transmission" and other functions have profound practical significance for the development of intelligence activities. By analysing the specific functions of brain computer interface technology for intelligence activities and the real risks of applying brain-computer interface technology in intelligence activities, we have constructed a compliance and protection mechanism that ranges from the guidance of principles to the anchoring of rules, and we strive to effectively safeguard the comprehensive application of brain-computer interface technology in the field of intelligence. In addition, it is necessary to adhere to the principle of preventive interest protection, the principle of interest level protection, and the principle of combining punishment and reward in the process of application, and dissolve the risks that brain-computer interface technology may face in the application of intelligence field from five aspects: the protection of individual's right to self-determination, the formulation of privacy compliance protection strategy, the strengthening of the supervision responsibility of the intelligence organisation, the improvement of the data security review system, and the formulation of the rewards and punishments mechanism for the protection of data compliance.

Cite this article

QIN Changsen, LIU Shuting . Brain-Computer interfaces enabling intelligence activities, real Risks, and compliance protection[J]. Science & Technology Review, 0 : 1 . DOI: 10.3981/i.issn.1000-7857.2024.01.00044

References

[1] 顾心怡, 陈少峰. 脑机接口的伦理问题研究[J].科学技术 哲学研究,2021, 38(4): 79-85. 

[2] 陈洲. 脑机接口技术日渐成熟 AI产业开启新蓝海[N]. 通信信息报,2023-07-19(007). 

[3] 秦长森, 张校基. 论脑机接口技术对法秩序的挑战及其 理性规制[J]. 山东行政学院学报, 2024(1): 41-49. 

[4] 刘轩, 陈海彬. 人工智能监管:理论、模式与趋势[J]. 情 报理论与实践,2023, 46(6): 17-23. 

[5] 邹纯龙, 马海群, 王今. 面向全国统一大市场的数据信 用体系构建研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(7): 44 50. 

[6] Lebedev M. A, Nicolelis M A. Brain-machine interfaces: Past, present and future[J]. Trends in Neurosciences, 2006, 29(9): 536-546. 

[7] 赵冰峰. 情报学:服务国家安全与发展的现代情报理论 [M]. 北京: 金城出版社, 2018: 146. 

[8] 黄斌. 现代情报服务与技术发展趋势[J]. 现代情报, 2013, 33(12): 37-40. www.kjdb.org 

[9] Kotchetkov I S, Hwang B Y, Appelboom G, et al. Brain computer interfaces: Military, neurosurgical, and ethical perspective[J]. Neurosurgical focus, 2010, 28(5): E25. 

[10] Denby B, Schultz T, Honda K, et al. Silent speech inter⁃ faces[J]. Speech Communication, 2010, 52(4): 270-287. 

[11] 王天尧, 吴素彬. 迈向智能化的美国军事情报工作发 展研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(3): 1-7+80. 

[12] 川出敏裕, 金光旭. 刑事政策[M]. 钱叶六, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社,2016: 7. 

[13] 彭知辉. 论公安情报分析与大数据分析的融合[J]. 情 报理论与实践,2017, 40(10): 36-40. 

[14] Anderez D O, Kanjo E, Amnwar A, et al. The rise of technology in crime prevention: Opportunities, challenges and practitioners perspectives[J]. arXiv preprint arX⁃ iv: 2102.04204, 2021. 

[15] 张世平. 走出竞争情报误区 构建企业竞争情报系统 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2010, 33(6): 65-68. 

[16] Ienca M, Fins J J, Jox R J, et al. Towards a governance framework for brain data[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2109.11960, 2021. 

[17] Insel T R. Digital phenotyping: technology for a new science of behavior[J]. Jama, 2017, 318(13): 1215-1216. 

[18] 李宝虹, 白建东, 张会来. 基于数据驱动的企业商业情 报管理[J]. 情报科学, 2014, 32(8): 20-26. 

[19] 程琳. 情报与现代信息关系[J]. 管理观察, 2017(36): 19-21+23. 

[20] 许鑫, 柯健等. 竞争情报分析方法及应用[M]. 北京: 科 学技术文献出版社,2021: 19. 

[21] 肖峰. 脑机接口与他心通达[J]. 哲学分析, 2023, 14(2): 114-127+198. 

[22] 王海明. 伦理学定义、对象和体系再思考[J]. 华侨大学 学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(1): 26-48. 

[23] 李佩瑄, 薛贵. 脑机接口的伦理问题及对策[J]. 科技导 报, 2018, 36(12): 38-45. 

[24] 郭华, 田雯, 刘星. 脑-机接口对个人自主的挑战与哲 学反思[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 26(5): 190-198. 

[25] 李佩瑄, 薛贵. 脑机接口的伦理问题及对策[J]. 科技导 报, 2018, 36(12): 38-45. 

[26] lein E, Goering S, Gagne J, et al. Brain-computer interfacebased control of closed-loop brain stimulation: Attitudes and ethical considerations[J]. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 2016, 3(3): 140-148. 

[27] 阿图尔·考夫曼. 法律哲学[M]. 刘幸义, 译. 北京:法律 出版社, 2011: 233. 

[28] 曹锦丹, 钟玉骏, 姚艺倍, 等. 健康风险认知过程中的信息框架效应及其神经活动特征分析[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(10): 26-32. 

[29] 化柏林. 论情报的本质[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012, 35 (7): 1-5. 

[30] 顾心怡, 陈少峰. 脑机接口的伦理问题研究[J]. 科学技 术哲学研究,2021, 38(4): 79-85. 

[31] 李本灿. 企业犯罪预防中合规计划制度的借鉴[J]. 中 国法学, 2015(5): 177-205. 

[32] 秦长森. 数字时代图书馆未成年读者信息隐私权保护 路径研究[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 42(3): 30-39. 

[33] 余永跃. 以人民为中心:中国式现代化的核心价值取 向[J]. 人民论坛, 2024(4): 46-50. 

[34] Andreoni J, Harbaugh W, Vesterlund L. The carrot or the stick: rewards, punishments, and cooperation[J]. The American Economic Review, 2003, doi: 10.1257/ 000282803322157142. 

[35] 俞小海. 论刑法同类解释规则中的“同类”[J]. 法学家, 2023(2): 60-73, 192-193. [36] 徐智华, 解彩霞. 算法逻辑下平台从业者权利保护的 危机及应对[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 42(1): 155-162.

Outlines

/